Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD007871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007871.pub3

Kultufan Turan 2006.

Methods Two‐group parallel RCT, one centre
ITT: unclear
Funding: not for profit
 Overall study quality: high risk of bias
 No sample size calculation was reported
Participants Inclusion criteria: Cardiac surgery either CABG or valve surgery
Exclusion criteria: None stated
Interventions Intervention group: TEG‐guided transfusion algorithm group for intervention after open heart surgery
Transfusion algorithm was fully based on TEG (ROTEG), (n = 20)
Control group: routine transfusion therapy for intervention after cardiopulmonary bypass, standard laboratory coagulation testing, (n = 20)
Duration of intervention: peri‐ and postoperative algorithm. Postoperative transfusion was indicated if bleeding was > 400 mL within an hour or > 1000 mL within 4 hours. ROTEG was performed perioperatively and 1 hour postoperation
Outcomes Primary: incidence of blood transfusion (whole blood, RBCs, FFP, and platelets)
Secondary: unclear. No data on adverse events
Notes Country: Turkey. Language: Turkish
Letter sent to authors in April and June 2010. Reply and supplemental data received in April and June 2010
Follow‐up: 24 hours.
Authors conclusion:"We conclude that utilization of ROTEG does not alter the transfusion management significantly in open heart surgery"
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk The doctor in charge of performing the ROTEG and the medical doctor in the ICU were blinded. However, it is unclear if the anaesthesiologist in charge of transfusion perioperatively were blinded to the group allocation.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Yes. Unable to compare with protocol or trial registration but appears to be free of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk Appears adequate and free of other biases.