Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 23;2016(11):CD007249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007249.pub5

Gilliam 2016.

Methods Design: individually randomized
Location: Chicago, IL (USA)
Time frame: February 201 to June 2016
Sample size calculation: no information
Participants 22 women
Inclusion criteria: African American or Latina; sexually active with male partner in past 6 months; age 15 to 29 years; seeking contraception; English speaking
 Exclusion criteria: currently pregnant or intending pregnancy in next 6 months; currently using LARC; highly intend to use LARC
Interventions Study focus: contraceptive counseling
Theory: not specified
  1. Multimedia app for tablet computer, reportedly based on theory, all contraceptive methods + videos on LARC use; standard contraceptive counseling

  2. Standard contraceptive counseling only

Outcomes LARC uptake (at initial visit); method satisfaction at 12 weeks; method continuation at 12 weeks
Notes Insufficient information from conference abstract and ClinicalTrials.gov for determining eligibility for review; will consider for inclusion when full report is available