Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 31;2016(10):CD010683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010683.pub3

Lodge 2005.

Methods Randomised clinical trial
Participants Country: European multicentre trial
 Number randomised: 204
 Postrandomisation dropouts: 19 (9.3%)
 Revised sample size: 185
 Average age: 57 years
 Women: 92 (49.7%)
 Number of cirrhotics: 0 (0%)
 Number of major liver resections: not stated
 Number of right hepatectomies: not stated
 Follow‐up (months): until discharge
 Further details of methods of liver resection
  1. Vascular occlusion: mixture of methods

  2. Parenchymal transection: not stated

  3. Fibrin glue: no

  4. Pharmacological methods: factor being randomised

  5. Cardiopulmonary methods: not stated

  6. Autologous transfusion: no


Inclusion criteria
  1. Non‐cirrhotic adults (≥ 18 years of age) scheduled to undergo partial hepatectomy for liver cancer/metastasis, benign tumors, or both

  2. Planned anatomical resection of 3 or more segments of the liver or planned nonanatomical resection of a volume equivalent to 2 or more segments of the liver parenchyma


Exclusion criteria
  1. Known hereditary bleeding disorders

  2. The planned use of autologous blood transfusion

  3. Low molecular weight heparin before hepatectomy

  4. Tissue glue or haemodilution therapy during surgery or haemostatic drugs for prophylactic purposes

  5. Renal insufficiency requiring dialysis

  6. Clinically documented portal vein or deep vein thrombosis or a history of the latter within the preceding 6 months

  7. Severe cardiovascular disease or previous myocardial/pulmonary infarction or stroke within the preceding 6 months

  8. Anticoagulation therapy not discontinued within 48 h before surgery

  9. Active bleeding

  10. Use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs within 7 d before surgery

Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups.
 Group 1: recombinant factor viia (n = 126)
 Group 2: control (n = 59)
 Recombinant factor VIIa: first dose: slow intravenous injection (20 mcg/kg or 80 mcg/kg) within 5 min before incision. Second dose: identical dose was given 5 h after incision if the surgery time was anticipated to exceed 6 h
 Control: placebo
Outcomes The outcomes reported were: short‐term mortality, long‐term mortality, proportion of people with serious adverse events, number of serious adverse events, number of adverse events, operative blood loss, proportion of people requiring blood transfusion, quantity of blood transfused (red cell transfusion or whole blood), and operating time.
Notes Reasons for postrandomisation dropouts: did not receive drug (n = 4); did not undergo hepatectomy (n = 15)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Randomization was computer‐generated and was performed after patient eligibility assessments on the day of surgery by means of a central interactive voice response system set up by Novo Nordisk A/S".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Randomization was computer‐generated and was performed after patient eligibility assessments on the day of surgery by means of a central interactive voice response system set up by Novo Nordisk A/S".
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "The current randomized, controlled, double‐blind, multi‐national trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa in noncirrhotic patients undergoing major liver resection. To maintain blinding, an equal volume of trial drug per body weight was administered to all patients, irrespective of treatment group allocation".
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "The current randomized, controlled, double‐blind, multi‐national trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa in noncirrhotic patients undergoing major liver resection. To maintain blinding, an equal volume of trial drug per body weight was administered to all patients, irrespective of treatment group allocation".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: there were postrandomisation dropouts.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: mortality and morbidity were reported.
Vested interest bias High risk Quote: "The authors thank the patients and the hospital staff participating in the trial, as well as Allan Blemings, M.Sc. (Statistician), and Karsten Soendergaard, M.Sc. (Clinical Researcher), both at Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark".
Other bias Low risk Comment: no other bias