Arru 2007 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Azoulay 2005 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Bellolio 2012 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Beppu 2012 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Broek 2011 |
Comparison of 2 methods of intermittent Pringle manoeuvre of different duration |
Chapman 2007 |
Variations of thrombin |
Correa‐Gallego 2015 |
Not an intervention targeted at decreasing blood loss |
Dello 2012 |
Comparison of 2 different methods of intermittent portal triad clamping |
Dominioni 2014 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
El‐Moghazy 2009 |
Comparison of minor variations of same transection method |
Esaki 2006 |
Comparison of 2 different methods of intermittent portal triad clamping |
Feldheiser 2015 |
Not an intervention targeted at decreasing blood loss |
Figueras 2003 |
Not a comparison with main focus on blood loss |
Frankel 2013 |
Different methods of selection for acute normovolemic haemodilution |
Gonzalez 2009 |
Comment on Figueras 2007
|
Gotohda 2015 |
Different methods of treatment of raw surface were allowed in control group |
Grobmyer 2009 |
The intervention was started 1 day after operation and used only in selected patients undergoing surgery. |
Hamady 2015 |
Comment on an excluded trial (Rahbari 2011) |
Hanyong 2015 |
Vascular occlusion was used in only method of parenchymal transection |
Harimoto 2011 |
Different methods of suturing on the raw surface of the liver |
Hashimoto 2007 |
Different methods of autologous blood donation (pre‐operative or pre‐operative + intra‐operative) |
Kaibori 2013 |
Variations in cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator technique |
Kim 2007 |
Comparison of 2 different methods of intermittent portal triad clamping |
Kim 2008 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Le Treut 1995 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Levit 2012 |
Comparison of interventions that were not of interest for this review |
Li 2013 |
In the control group, 2 different forms of vascular occlusion were used |
Li 2015 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Lu 2014 |
Low central venous pressure was used in fast‐track group, but this was combined with a number of other measures in the intervention group only. |
Man 2002 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Nagano 2009 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Narita 2012 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
NCT01651182 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Obiekwe 2014 |
Quasi‐randomised study (alternate assignment) |
Palibrk 2012 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Petras 2009 |
Comment on Richter 2009
|
Petrowsky 2006 |
Ischaemic preconditioning was applied only in 1 group |
Rahbari 2011 |
Different methods of achieving low central venous pressure |
Rau 1995 |
Started as a randomised clinical trial but did not continue because of problems with nozzles of jet cutter. So, the report consisted of non‐randomised patients. |
Richter 2009 |
In this randomised clinical trial, if the patients did not undergo liver resection, the envelopes were resealed and returned to the pool of sealed envelopes. The allocation concealment is not adequate in this trial. |
Ryu 2010 |
Comparison of different methods of low central venous pressure |
Saiura 2006 |
Comparison of variations in clamp‐crush method |
Saiura 2014 |
Comparison of variations in clamp‐crush method |
Schilling 2009 |
Comment on Richter 2009
|
Schwartz 2004 |
In the control group a number of topical haemostatic agents were used. |
Shu 2014 |
In this study, patients were divided into 4 groups ‐ people who received blood transfusion and ulinastatin, people who received blood transfusion but not ulinastatin, people who received ulinastatin but not blood transfusion, and people who did not receive blood transfusion or ulinastatin. Although the authors randomised patients to ulinastatin or control, they ensured that the number of patients in each group was the same, i.e. the number of people in ulinastatin group who received blood transfusion was 50% and the number of people in control group who received blood transfusion was 50%. This would have seriously impaired the randomisation to the extent that we feel that this is not a randomised clinical at all. |
Si‐Yuan 2011 |
Used continuous and intermittent portal triad clamping depending upon transection time with vascular occlusion being the factor randomised |
Smyrniotis 2002 |
Quasi‐randomised (random sequence generated by hospital number) |
Smyrniotis 2003a |
Quasi‐randomised (random sequence generated by hospital number) |
Smyrniotis 2003b |
Quasi‐randomised (random sequence generated by hospital number) |
Smyrniotis 2006 |
Ischaemic preconditioning was applied to only one of the groups |
Standl 1998 |
Variations in autologous blood donation |
Strobel 2012 |
Commentary on Lee 2012
|
Strobel 2014 |
Commentary on Rahbari 2014
|
Takatsuki 2015 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Torzilli 2008 |
Variations in clamp‐crush method |
Vlad 2014 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Wang 2010 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Wang 2011 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Yang 2012 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Yang 2013 |
Variations in selective hepatic vascular exclusion |
Yin 2003 |
Not a randomised clinical trial |
Zhang 2014 |
Variations in portal triad clamping |
Zhu 2012 |
Different methods of low central venous pressure |