Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 31;2016(10):CD010683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010683.pub3
Study Reason for exclusion
Arru 2007 Not a randomised clinical trial
Azoulay 2005 Not a randomised clinical trial
Bellolio 2012 Not a randomised clinical trial
Beppu 2012 Not a randomised clinical trial
Broek 2011 Comparison of 2 methods of intermittent Pringle manoeuvre of different duration
Chapman 2007 Variations of thrombin
Correa‐Gallego 2015 Not an intervention targeted at decreasing blood loss
Dello 2012 Comparison of 2 different methods of intermittent portal triad clamping
Dominioni 2014 Not a randomised clinical trial
El‐Moghazy 2009 Comparison of minor variations of same transection method
Esaki 2006 Comparison of 2 different methods of intermittent portal triad clamping
Feldheiser 2015 Not an intervention targeted at decreasing blood loss
Figueras 2003 Not a comparison with main focus on blood loss
Frankel 2013 Different methods of selection for acute normovolemic haemodilution
Gonzalez 2009 Comment on Figueras 2007
Gotohda 2015 Different methods of treatment of raw surface were allowed in control group
Grobmyer 2009 The intervention was started 1 day after operation and used only in selected patients undergoing surgery.
Hamady 2015 Comment on an excluded trial (Rahbari 2011)
Hanyong 2015 Vascular occlusion was used in only method of parenchymal transection
Harimoto 2011 Different methods of suturing on the raw surface of the liver
Hashimoto 2007 Different methods of autologous blood donation (pre‐operative or pre‐operative + intra‐operative)
Kaibori 2013 Variations in cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator technique
Kim 2007 Comparison of 2 different methods of intermittent portal triad clamping
Kim 2008 Not a randomised clinical trial
Le Treut 1995 Not a randomised clinical trial
Levit 2012 Comparison of interventions that were not of interest for this review
Li 2013 In the control group, 2 different forms of vascular occlusion were used
Li 2015 Not a randomised clinical trial
Lu 2014 Low central venous pressure was used in fast‐track group, but this was combined with a number of other measures in the intervention group only.
Man 2002 Not a randomised clinical trial
Nagano 2009 Not a randomised clinical trial
Narita 2012 Not a randomised clinical trial
NCT01651182 Not a randomised clinical trial
Obiekwe 2014 Quasi‐randomised study (alternate assignment)
Palibrk 2012 Not a randomised clinical trial
Petras 2009 Comment on Richter 2009
Petrowsky 2006 Ischaemic preconditioning was applied only in 1 group
Rahbari 2011 Different methods of achieving low central venous pressure
Rau 1995 Started as a randomised clinical trial but did not continue because of problems with nozzles of jet cutter. So, the report consisted of non‐randomised patients.
Richter 2009 In this randomised clinical trial, if the patients did not undergo liver resection, the envelopes were resealed and returned to the pool of sealed envelopes. The allocation concealment is not adequate in this trial.
Ryu 2010 Comparison of different methods of low central venous pressure
Saiura 2006 Comparison of variations in clamp‐crush method
Saiura 2014 Comparison of variations in clamp‐crush method
Schilling 2009 Comment on Richter 2009
Schwartz 2004 In the control group a number of topical haemostatic agents were used.
Shu 2014 In this study, patients were divided into 4 groups ‐ people who received blood transfusion and ulinastatin, people who received blood transfusion but not ulinastatin, people who received ulinastatin but not blood transfusion, and people who did not receive blood transfusion or ulinastatin. Although the authors randomised patients to ulinastatin or control, they ensured that the number of patients in each group was the same, i.e. the number of people in ulinastatin group who received blood transfusion was 50% and the number of people in control group who received blood transfusion was 50%. This would have seriously impaired the randomisation to the extent that we feel that this is not a randomised clinical at all.
Si‐Yuan 2011 Used continuous and intermittent portal triad clamping depending upon transection time with vascular occlusion being the factor randomised
Smyrniotis 2002 Quasi‐randomised (random sequence generated by hospital number)
Smyrniotis 2003a Quasi‐randomised (random sequence generated by hospital number)
Smyrniotis 2003b Quasi‐randomised (random sequence generated by hospital number)
Smyrniotis 2006 Ischaemic preconditioning was applied to only one of the groups
Standl 1998 Variations in autologous blood donation
Strobel 2012 Commentary on Lee 2012
Strobel 2014 Commentary on Rahbari 2014
Takatsuki 2015 Not a randomised clinical trial
Torzilli 2008 Variations in clamp‐crush method
Vlad 2014 Not a randomised clinical trial
Wang 2010 Not a randomised clinical trial
Wang 2011 Not a randomised clinical trial
Yang 2012 Not a randomised clinical trial
Yang 2013 Variations in selective hepatic vascular exclusion
Yin 2003 Not a randomised clinical trial
Zhang 2014 Variations in portal triad clamping
Zhu 2012 Different methods of low central venous pressure