El‐Nashar 2011.
Methods | RCT Single centre Egypt |
|
Participants | Included women with primary infertility undergoing ICSI cycle; no other
criteria mentioned Exclusion criteria: not mentioned |
|
Interventions | Intervention group (N = 62) underwent hysteroscopy and directed endometrial
biopsy before ICSI. Any uterine abnormalities found were corrected. Control group (N = 62): no hysteroscopy |
|
Outcomes | Clinical pregnancy rate, normal and abnormal hysteroscopy findings | |
Notes | This was published as a conference abstract. There was no response from authors to email queries regarding participants and data. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Authors use "randomized" in the abstract. However, information provided was insufficient for making a judgement. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding was not mentioned. However, absence of blinding was unlikely to influence performance bias. Hence, absence of blinding was categorised as low risk for performance bias. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding was not mentioned. However, absence of blinding was unlikely to influence the findings for our primary and secondary outcomes, hence, categorised as low risk for detection bias. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided regarding losses to follow‐up or dropouts. Insufficient information for making a judgement |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No published protocol. While all the prespecified outcomes were reported, primary outcome (live birth) was not reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | There was not enough information to make a judgement. This was a conference abstract. |