Luo 2010.
Methods | RCT, single hospital, China. | |
Participants | 300 women, all primiparas without previous abdominal surgeries, undergoing CS under epidural anaesthesia. No information on type of CS (elective or non‐elective). | |
Interventions | Intervention group (N = 150): chewing gum 4 times/d (2‐4 pieces each time) for 10‐15 minutes per session, (time chewing = 40‐60 min/d) from 2 h‐3 d after CS. Control group (N = 150): early feeding protocol (semi‐solid food after 6 h, normal diet after passage of flatus). | |
Outcomes | Time to first flatus and passage of faeces and also bowel sound (although this last was not prespecified as an outcome in Methods). Additional outcomes: incidence of abdominal distension, dry mouth, bad breath, incision pain. |
|
Notes | No study protocol available. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information available. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information available. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | The nature of the study did not allow blinding after assignment of the intervention postoperatively. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Subjective outcomes | High risk | Participants were unable to be adequately blinded in relation to passage of flatus or stools. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Objective outcomes | Unclear risk | No information about blinding of outcome assessors for time to first bowel sounds. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No losses, all randomised participants included in results. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All prespecified outcomes were reported. Bowel sound was reported in Results but was not a pre‐specified outcome. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No information available. |