NCT00001723.
Methods |
Type of trial: interventional, randomised controlled trial Allocation: randomised Intervention model: parallel assignment Masking: double blind (participant, carer, investigator, outcomes assessor) Primary purpose: treatment |
|
Participants |
Condition:
Enrolment: 200 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention: orlistat Comparator: placebo |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcome: change in BMI SDS (baseline to 6 months) Secondary outcomes:
|
|
Study details |
NCT number: NCT00001723 Other trial ID numbers: 980111, 98‐CH‐0111 |
|
Publication details | "Safety and Efficacy of Orlistat (Xenical, Hoffmann LaRoche) in African American and Caucasian Children and Adolescents with Obesity‐Related Comorbid Conditions" | |
Stated aim for study | Quote: "Researchers propose to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Xenical [orlistat] in 12‐17 year old severely obese African American and Caucasian children and adolescents who have one or more obesity‐related disease (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, sleep apnea, hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, or Type 2 diabetes)" | |
Notes | The trial was completed when identified. Trial collaborators:
Results presented on the clinicaltrials.gov website and in a conference abstract. Results from ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database: change in BMI SDS orlistat: ‐0.12 ± 0.02 and placebo: ‐0.06 ± 0.02. ANCOVA differences between groups P value = 0.007. Change in bodyweight orlistat: ‐2.9 ± 0.7 and placebo: ‐0.6 ± 0.7. No statistical analysis provided. Change in BMI orlistat: ‐1.44 ± 0.26 and placebo: ‐0.50 ± 0.20. No statistical analysis provided. 95/100 participants in orlistat and 94/100 in placebo group experienced adverse events with the most common being gastrointestinal disorders. No serious adverse events in orlistat group. In placebo group, 1 participant had hypoglycaemia and 1 participant had left lower quadrant pain and vomiting, and was admitted to hospital overnight |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk |
Quote from author (via email): "We randomized participants in a 1:1 fashion to orlistat 120 mg or identical appearing placebo thrice daily with meals plus a daily multivitamin (Centrum, Whitehall‐Robins Healthcare, Madison, NJ) containing 5000 IU vitamin A (80% as retinol, 20% as beta carotene), 400 IU vitamin D as ergocalciferol, 30 IU vitamin E (as di‐α tocopheryl acetate), and 25 mcg vitamin K (as phytonadione). Investigators assigned consecutive code numbers to participants from pre‐specified lists that were stratified by race (Caucasian versus African American), sex (Male, Female), and degree of pubertal development (3 strata for boys: testes <15ml, testes 15‐20mL, and testes >20mL; for girls: Breast Tanner stage I‐III; Tanner stage IV, and Tanner stage V). The NIH CRC Pharmaceutical Development Section used permuted blocks with stratification to generate allocations that translated code numbers into trial group assignments by using a pseudo‐random number program" Comment: randomisation process described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk |
Quote from author (via email): "Pharmacy personnel not involved with the conduct of the study, dispensed identical‐appearing study capsules in containers that differed only by participant code number. During the trial, no participant, investigator, or other medical or nursing staff interacting with participants was aware of study group assignments" Comment: allocation was concealed |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Objective outcomes | Low risk |
Quote: "Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)" Comment: participants and personnel were blinded |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Subjective outcomes | Low risk |
Quote: "Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)" Comment: participants and personnel were blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Objective outcomes | Low risk |
Quote: "Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)" Comment: assessors were blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Subjective outcomes | Low risk |
Quote: "Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)" Comment: assessors were blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Objective outcomes | Low risk | Comment: according to ClinicalTrials.gov, 87% of orlistat participants completed the trial, 84% completed placebo arm |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Subjective outcomes | Low risk | Comment: according to ClinicalTrials.gov, 87% of orlistat participants completed the trial, 84% completed placebo arm |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: there are differences in the results reported on the ClinicalTrial.gov website and in the conference abstract |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Comment: unclear as limited information available |