Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 6;2017(1):CD007906. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007906.pub3

1.7. Analysis.

Comparison 1 Intensive Case Management versus standard care, Outcome 7 Service use: 4b. Average number of admissions to ER (skewed data) ‐ by medium term.

Service use: 4b. Average number of admissions to ER (skewed data) ‐ by medium term
Study Intervention Mean SD Total Note
Jerrell‐SCarolina1 1991 1. ICM 0.85 1.7* 40  
Jerrell‐SCarolina1 1991 2. Standard care 0.73 3.3* 40 * Carried over from
 Lehman‐Maryland1.
Lehman‐Maryland1 1994 1. ICM 0.9 1.7 77  
Lehman‐Maryland1 1994 2. Standard care 2 3.3 75