Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 6;2017(1):CD007906. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007906.pub3

2.11. Analysis.

Comparison 2 Intensive Case Management versus non‐Intensive Case Management, Outcome 11 Global state: 2b. Average endpoint score (HoNOS, high = poor) ‐ skewed data.

Global state: 2b. Average endpoint score (HoNOS, high = poor) ‐ skewed data
Study Intervention Mean SD Total
medium term
Harrison‐Read‐UK 2000 1. ICM 12 6.8 54
Harrison‐Read‐UK 2000 2. non‐ICM 11.4 6.4 64
long term
Harrison‐Read‐UK 2000 1. ICM 11.9 5.9 60
Harrison‐Read‐UK 2000 2. non‐ICM 10.4 6.4 59