Costs: 3. Direct costs ‐ other data ‐ skewed data | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Intervention | Mean | SD | Total | Note |
all care ‐ by short term | |||||
Audini‐UK 1994 | 1.ICM* | 4,264 | 1,768 | 33 | |
Audini‐UK 1994 | 2. Standard care* | 7,202 | 5,564 | 29 | * Unit cost £, fiscal year 1996/7.
** 'Bivariate cost comparisons (after log transformation) revealed significant advantage for ICM group (p=0.001)'. ***Time period: missing (it is not the monthly cost per patient). |
all care ‐ by medium term | |||||
Marshall‐UK 1995 | 1. ICM* | 1,044 | 425.3 | 31 | |
Marshall‐UK 1995 | 2. Standard care* | 1,108 | 530.4 | 30 | * Unit cost £, fiscal year 1994.
** 'No significant differences between two groups were found.' ***Time period: mean weekly cost. |
Morse‐Missouri3 2005 | 1. ICM* | 2,946.8 | 3,219.3 | 54 | |
Morse‐Missouri3 2005 | 2. Standard care* | 1,899.5 | 3,629.6 | 49 | * Unit cost US $, fiscal year 2001.
** 'There was a main effect of treatment condition on total costs, F(2, 146)=4.00, p=0.02, ɧ2=0.05. Standard care condition had significantly lower costs than ICM.' ***Time period: 6 months |
all care ‐ by long term | |||||
Audini‐UK 1994 | 1. ICM* | 10,192 | 3,900 | 32 | |
Audini‐UK 1994 | 2. Standard care* | 15,288 | 17,160 | 28 | * Unit cost £, fiscal year 1996/7.
** 'Bivariate cost comparisons (after log transformation) did not revealed significant advantage for ICM group (p=0.09)'. ***Time period: missing (it is not the monthly cost per patient). |
Ford‐UK 1995 | 1. ICM* | 1,813 | 1,347 | 39 | |
Ford‐UK 1995 | 2. Standard care* | 717 | 768 | 38 | * Unit cost £, fiscal year not reported, study base year 1990.
** 'ANOVA analysis carried on, revealing significant advantage for ICM group (p<0.05).' ***Time period: 12 months. |
Marshall‐UK 1995 | 1. ICM* | 996 | 398 | 31 | |
Marshall‐UK 1995 | 2. Standard care* | 1,088 | 562.4 | 30 | * Unit cost £, fiscal year 1994.
** 'No significant differences between two groups were found.' ***Time period: mean weekly cost. |
Morse‐Missouri3 2005 | 1. ICM* | 3,190 | 3,441 | 54 | |
Morse‐Missouri3 2005 | 2. Standard care* | 1,467 | 2,173 | 49 | * Unit cost US $, fiscal year 2001. ** 'There was a main effect of treatment condition on total costs, F(2, 146)=4.00, p=0.02, ɧ2=0.05. Standard care condition had significantly lower costs than ICM.' ***Time period: 6 months. |
OPUS‐Denmark 1999 | 1. ICM* | 111,924 | 100,862 | 151 | |
OPUS‐Denmark 1999 | 2. Standard Care* | 137,638 | 147,570 | 150 | *Unit cost Euro €, fiscal year 2009. **No significant difference between the groups. ***Time period: FUP 3 years. |
specific ‐ outpatient care ‐ by medium term | |||||
Cusack‐North Carolina | 1. ICM* | 13,481 | 9,547 | 72 | * Unit cost US $. **Time period: 12 months. |
Cusack‐North Carolina | 2. Standard care* | 5,118 | 6,184 | 62 | * Unit cost US $. **Time period: 12 months. |
specific ‐ prison ‐ by medium term | |||||
Cusack‐North Carolina | 1. ICM* | 1,848 | 4,533 | 72 | * Unit cost US $. **Time period: 12 months. |
Cusack‐North Carolina | 2. Standard care* | 3,530 | 5,690 | 62 | * Unit cost US $. **Time period: 12 months. |