Table 3. Modelling confidence ratings.
GLME | ||||
Experiment 1 | Fixed-Effect | REDUCED 1 | REDUCED 2 | FULL |
Intercept (β0) | 0.52±0.04 t5079 = 14.46; P = 1.90×10−46 |
0.72±0.02 t5124 = 39.00; P = 1.61×10−291 |
0.53±0.04 t5078 = 14.55; P = 4.92×10−47 |
|
Choice difficulty (βΔQ) | 0.33±0.06 t5079 = 5.77; P = 8.43×10−9 |
0.47±0.07 t5124 = 6.51; P = 8.18×10−11- |
0.30±0.05 t5078 = 5.96; P = 2.73×10−9 |
|
Preceding confidence (βc1) | 0.28±0.04 t5079 = 7.60; P = 3.62×10−14 |
- | 0.28±0.03 t5078 = 7.39; P = 1.67×10−13 |
|
Context value (βV) | - | 0.45±0.14 t5124 = 3.16; P = 1.58×10−3 |
0.47±0.14 t5078 = 3.21; P = 1.35×10−3 |
|
GLME | ||||
Experiment 2 | Fixed-Effect | REDUCED 1 | REDUCED 2 | FULL |
Intercept (β0) | 0.53±0.03 t5145 = 17.57; P = 3.77×10−67 |
0.75±0.02 t5145 = 44.91; P = 0 |
0.53±0.03 t5144 = 17.12; P = 5.94×10−64 |
|
Choice difficulty (βΔQ) | 0.18±0.02 t5145 = 6.33; P = 2.63×10−10 |
0.25±0.04 t5145 = 6.51; P = 8.26×10−11 |
0.17±0.03 t5144 = 5.90; P = 3.85×10−9 |
|
Preceding confidence (βc1) | 0.29±0.04 t5145 = 7.01; P = 2.75×10−12 |
- | 0.30±0.04 t5144 = 7.48; P = 8.54×10−14 |
|
Context value (βV) | - | 0.17±0.7 t5145 = 2.52; P = 1.18×10−2 |
0.16±0.06 t5144 = 2.51; P = 1.19×10−2 |
Note that the number of degrees-of-freedom differs between REDUCED GLME 1 and 2 in Experiment 1, because some participants failed to answer within the allocated time, causing missed observations. This has a lower impact on the number of usable observations in the REDUCED GLME 2 because this model does not make use of “preceding confidence” (which are missing observations–in addition to the missed trials- in the REDUCED GLME 2 and FULL FLME).