9. Treatment satisfaction.
| Study (condition) | Design | Outcome | Results | Notes |
| Byng (chronic mental illness) | RCT | Mean total satisfaction score | Int: 3.71. Con: 3.66. Absolute difference 0.05. Relative % difference 1.4%. | No standard deviations available |
| Dice (diabetes) | RCT | Mean satisfaction score in patients with type 2 diabetes | Int: 42.3 (sd 5.6). Con: 41.1 (sd 6.2). Absolute difference 1.2. Relative % difference 3%. | SES = 0.21 |
| Dice (diabetes) | RCT | Mean satisfaction score in type 1 patients with type 1 diabetes | Int: 51.9 (sd 7.5). Con: 49.8 (sd 7.5). Absolute difference 2.1. Relative % difference 4%. | SES = 0.28 |
| Swindle (depression) | RCT | Overall satisfaction score | Int: 3.2 (sd 0.9). Con: 3.2 (sd 0.9). Absolute difference 0. Relative % difference 0. | SES = 0 |
| Warner (depression) | RCT | Mean client satisfaction score | Int: 22.3 (sd 6.5). Con: 23.4 (sd 4.4). Absolute difference 1.1. Relative % difference 4.7%. | SES = 0.2 |
| Richards (depression) | RCT | Mean CSQ‐8 score | Int: 25.3 (sd 5.8). Con: 22.1 (sd 6.2). Absolute difference 3.2. Relative % difference 14.5%. | SES = 0.52* |
| Solberg (depression) | RCT | Mean treatment satisfaction score | Int: 3.95. Con: 3.44. Absolute difference 0.51. Relative % difference 15%. | *No standard deviations available |
| Drummond (asthma) | RCT | % patients very satisfied with care | Int: 256/333. Con: 286/333. Absolute difference ‐9%. Relative % difference ‐10%. | *Favours control |
| Katon 1999 (depression) | RCT | % rating care as very good to excellent | Int: 68/86. Con: 51/80. Absolute difference 16%. Relative % difference 25%. | * |
| Katon 2004 (depression) | RCT | % moderately or very satisfied with treatment | Int: 106/146. Con: 76/141. Absolute difference 0.19. Relative % difference 35%. | * |
| Smith 2004 (diabetes) | RCT | % very satisfied on diabetes treatment satisfaction measure | Int: 49/87. Con: 22/83. Absolute difference 29%. Relative % difference 107%. | * |
| Unutzer (depression) | RCT | % rating depression care as very good/excellent | Int: 676/889. Con: 409/870. Absolute difference 29%. Relative % difference 62%. | * |
| Fortney (depression) | RCT | % satisfied with care | Int: 100/146. Con: 113/189. Absolute difference 10%. Relative % difference 16%. | * |
| Katon 2010 (diabetes/CHD/depression) | RCT | % satisfied with diabetes/CHD/depression care | Int: 77/92. Con: 62/88. Absolute difference 13.2%. Relative % difference 18.7%. | * |
| Dobscha (chronic pain) | RCT | Mean global treatment satisfaction | Int: 2.7 (sd 1.05). Con: 2.6 (sd 1.12). Absolute difference 0.1. Relative % difference 3.8%. | SES = 0.09 |
| Fihn (ischaemic heart disease) | RCT | Adjusted difference satisfaction with provider | Intervention effect coefficient 1.54. | |
| Fihn (ischaemic heart disease) | RCT | Adjusted difference treatment satisfaction (SAQ) | Intervention effect coefficient 1.22. | |
| Van Orden (mental health) | RCT | Mean patient satisfaction | Int: 6.6 (sd 1.5). Con: 6.7 (sd 1.5). Absolute difference ‐0.1. Relative % difference 1.5%. | SES = 0.06 |
| Van Orden (mental health) | RCT | Mean GP satisfaction | Int: 4.0 (sd 0.7). Con: 3.7 (sd 0.7). Absolute difference 0.3. Relative % difference 8.1%. | SES = 0.43* |
CSQ‐8: Client Satisfaction Questionnaire.
CHD: coronary Heart Disease.
SAQ: Seattle Angina Questinnaire.