Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2019 Apr 5;8(2):e8423. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.8423

Table 3.

Differences in the 7 tools in electronic health literacy assessment between users and nonusers of sundhed.dk and NemID.

Tool in eHLA^a	Mean	Users of sundhed.dk			Users of NemID
Tool in eHLA^a	Mean	Yes/No, N	Mean (IQR^b)	P value	Yes/No, N	Mean (IQR)	P value
1. Functional health literacy	9.5	Yes, 120	9.5 (9-10)	.75	Yes, 207	9.5 (9-10)	.89
1. Functional health literacy	9.5	No, 86	9.4 (9-10)		No, 8	9.5 (9-10)
2. Self-assessed health literacy	3.3	Yes, 123	3.3 (2.9-3.7)	.004	Yes, 217	3.2 (2.9-3.6)	.007
2. Self-assessed health literacy	3.3	No, 93	3.1 (2.8-3.3)		No, 11	2.8 (2.6-3.2)
3. Familiarity with health and disease	3.1	Yes, 124	3.3 (3.0-3.8)	.006	Yes, 221	3.1 (2.6-3.8)	.58
3. Familiarity with health and disease	3.1	No, 95	2.9 (2.4-3.8)		No, 10	3.0 (2.8-3.4)
4. Knowledge of health and disease	9.7	Yes, 119	9.9 (9-12)	.01	Yes, 213	9.6 (8-11)	.41
4. Knowledge of health and disease	9.7	No, 92	9.3 (8-10)		No, 10	10.1 (8-12)
5. Digital familiarity	3.5	Yes, 125	3.7 (3.5-4.0)	<.001	Yes, 220	3.6 (3.5-4.0)	<.001
5. Digital familiarity	3.5	No, 95	3.2 (2.8-4.0)		No, 12	1.7 (1.0-2.3)
6. Digital confidence	3.4	Yes, 129	3.6 (3.3-4.0)	.02	Yes, 225	3.5 (3.3-4.0)	<.001
6. Digital confidence	3.4	No, 92	3.3 (2.8-4.0)		No, 8	1.7 (1.0-2.3)
7. Digital incentives	3.5	Yes, 133	3.6 (3.3-4.0)	.005	Yes, 230	3.5 (3.0-4.0)	<.001
7. Digital incentives	3.5	No, 93	3.3 (2.8-4.0)		No, 8	2.0 (1.3-2.8)

^aeHLA: eHealth literacy assessment.

^bIQR: interquartile range.