Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 12;6:48. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00048

Table 4.

Trials for immunosuppressive treatment in myocarditis [modified from Maisch and Pankuweit (9) with permission from Springer-Nature].

References Treatment No pts/Controls Treated pts improved Treated pts Unch/deter. Controls improved Controls unch/deter. Endpoint/Comments
A. OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES AND SMALL TRIALS WITH IMMUNOSUPPRESSION
Fenoglio et al. (75) P, A & P 18/4 7 (39%) 11 (61%) 2 (50%) 2 (50%) EF/observational, no PCR
Hosenpud et al. (76) A & P 6/0 0 (0%) 6 (100%) EF/No co, no PCR, no co biopsy
Anderson et al. (77) A & P 10/7 3 (30%) 7 (70%) 2 (28,5%) 5 (71,5%) Prospective, open label, randomized
Marboe and Fenoglio (78) P, A & P 16/18 9 (56%) 7 (44%) 7 (39%) 11 (61%) P, A & P mixed
Latham et al., (79) P 26/26 Majority Minority nd nd EF/No viral PCR, no biopsy
Maisch et al. (80) A & P 21/21 all virus negative 10 (47%) 11 (53%) 3 (14%) 18 (86%) EF (6 mo)/RCT pilot
Kühl et al. (81) P 31/0 20 (54%) 11 (46%) nd nd EF; observational/ No co EMB
Camargo et al. (82) P 68/0 Majority Minority nd nd EF/observational, No viral PCR
Liu Dezue et al. (83) D 128/0 Favorable, but no data nd nd nd Observational/No EMB, CM
Sun (84) D 32/0 Majority Minority nd nd EF/observational, EKG only, no PCR, CM
Wu and Chen (85) D & P 31/0 Majority Minority nd nd Observational/ No EMB, CM
Frustaci et al. (86) A & P 41/0 21 (51%) 20 (49%) nd nd EF/RCT, virus negative pts improved
Escher et al. (87) A & P 114 Majority Minority nd nd EF 6 mo/observational, no co biopsy
References No pts/Co Treatment Endpoints Treated pts improved Treated pts Unch/deter. Controls improved Controls unch/deter. Comments
B. DOUBLE BLIND, RANDOMIZED, AND CONTROLLED TREATMENT TRIALS (RCT) WITH IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE DRUGS IN MYOCARDITIS
Parillo et al. (88) 51 /51 P vs. Pl EF after 3 mo, mortality 53%
No difference
47% No difference 27%
No difference
73%
No difference
RCT,
no PCR
Mason et al. (89) MTT 64/47 A/C & P
vs. Pl
EF/function
+Mortality
No difference
No difference
No difference No difference No difference
No difference
No difference
No difference
RCT, no PCR (90)
Wojnicz et al. (91) 41/43 A & P
vs. Pl
EF/function In majority In minority Minority with spontaneous improvement Majority No PCR, HLA as criterium of inflammation
Cooper et al. (74), Maisch et al. (69, 70) 11/? Cyclo+P
vs. Pl
Mortality 12 mo Improved nd nd nd RCT, stopped for lack of pts
Frustaci et al. (92)
TIMIC
43/42 A & P
vs. Pl
EF (6 mo)
Mortality
88,3
nd
11,7
nd
0
nd
100
nd
WHF, RCT, virus negative pts only
Maisch et al. (93) ESETCID 54/47 Tx arms with A& P
vs. Pl
EF/function
MACE
EF+MACE
improved
after 6 month
Some spontaneous improvement WHF, RCT, intermediate results

A, Azathioprin; co, controls; CM, Chinese medicine; Cyclo, Cyclosporine; D, Dexamethason; DC, dilated cardiomyopathy; deter, deteriorated; EF, Ejection fraction; EMB, endomyocardial biopsy; mo, months; nd, no data; P, prednisone; Pl, placebo; PCR, polymerase chain reaction for viral RNA and DNA in EMB; pts, patients; RCT, randomized controlled trial; unch, unchanged; WHF, quantitative World Heart Federation biopsy criteria.