Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 13;2017(3):CD012286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012286.pub2

Comparison 5. Adults: feedback device versus control/usual care.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
5.1 Inhaler technique (PIF) 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.2 Correct inhaler technique (at follow‐up) 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
5.3 Inhaler technique score 1   Other data No numeric data
5.4 Asthma control 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
5.5 Quality of life 2 100 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.38 [‐0.01, 0.77]
5.6 Quality of life (responders) 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only