Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 13;2017(3):CD012286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012286.pub2

Ammari 2013.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: parallel‐group randomised controlled trial; blinding not stated
Duration: 6 weeks
Setting: 1 outpatient clinic, UK
Trial registration: not reported
Participants Population: 56 people with asthma randomised to 2 Tone Trainer (2TT) group (n = 23; 17 adults, 6 children) or verbal counselling (VC) group (n = 23; 17 adults, 6 children). Children with adequate technique at initial assessment formed the "control" group (not of interest in this study, as not randomised) (we have assigned the 2TT as the "intervention" arm and the VC as the "control" arm)
Age: 4 to 55 years; mean (SD) age in the intervention group: adults 38.5 (10.8) years, children 11.7 (2.4) years; and in the control group: adults 42.4 (7.2) years, children 11.2 (2.4) years
Baseline asthma severity: "Mild‐moderate‐severe asthma, according to GINA 2008"
Inclusion criteria: 4 to 55‐year‐old asthmatic patients prescribed at least 1 MDI without spacer
Exclusion criteria: experienced an acute exacerbation or received oral prednisolone within 4 weeks before recruitment, other illnesses adversely affecting respiratory system, hearing problems and/or unable to distinguish between 1 and 2 tones produced by the 2TT tool
Percentage withdrawn: 12% adults, 0% children withdrew from the intervention (2TT) arm; 18% adults and 17% children withdrew from the "control" (VC) arm
Other allowed medication: not reported
Interventions Intervention summary: verbal training plus use of 2 Tone Trainer (2TT) device, which participants were able to take home. 2TT is a training aid with audible feedback when the required slow inhalation flow is used
Control summary: verbal training with emphasis on inspiratory flow rate
Outcomes Outcomes measured: lung function measures: change in FEV1; inhalation flow rate; QOL: Juniper's Asthma QOL Questionnaire (AQLQ): adults ‐ Mini AQLQ; children ‐ PAQLQ; PACQLQ by parents of children
Technique assessment method used: PIF was used as a measure of inhaler technique
Notes Type of publication: single peer‐reviewed journal article
Funding: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "…based on a previously constructed randomization table"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk No description of procedures intended to blind participants or personnel to group assignment
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk No description of procedures intended to blind outcome assessors to group assignment; for outcomes such as AQLQ, participant/caregiver is the outcome assessor; therefore these outcomes may be at risk of detection bias
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk 56 asthmatic patients enrolled and 50 completed the 2 study visits as per protocol. Balanced drop‐out
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No prospective trial registration identified. No power analysis reported. Outcomes listed in Methods all reported in the text
Other bias Low risk None noted