Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 13;2017(3):CD012286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012286.pub2

Arthurs 2014.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: parallel‐group randomised controlled trial; blinding not stated
Duration: 3 months
Setting: paediatric ward, Ireland
Trial registration: not reported
Participants Population: 21 children with asthma randomised to DVD inhaler instruction or individual instruction (n for each group not reported)
Age: not reported
Baseline asthma severity: not reported
Inclusion criteria: children already using or with newly prescribed inhalers over 3 months in paediatric ward
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Percentage withdrawn: not reported
Other allowed medication: not reported
Interventions Intervention summary: DVD inhaler instruction about valved holding chamber use
Control summary: individual instruction equivalent to information in the DVD; delivered by a physiotherapist
Outcomes Outcomes measured: inhaler technique, self‐efficacy and knowledge acquisition
Technique assessment method used: "Technique was assessed immediately post and 3 months after education with a new outcome measure. Intra‐rater and inter‐rater reliability of the new measure was examined"
Notes Type of publication: conference abstract
Funding: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "21 participants were randomised to DVD or individual education" ‐ no further details
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk "Technique was assessed pre‐education in non‐naive participants". Participants and personnel were aware of group allocation
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk No mention of blinded outcome assessment, but only a conference abstract available
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Numerical results not reported
Other bias Low risk None noted