Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 13;2017(3):CD012286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012286.pub2

Fernandes 2011.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: parallel‐group randomised controlled trial; blinding not stated
Duration: 12 weeks
Setting: "hospital" based, country not stated
Trial registration: not reported
Participants Population: 89 people with asthma randomised to an education intervention group (n = 43) or a control group (n = 46) (n not stated explicitly for each group; these numbers are calculated from the percentage female given per group)
Age: mean age (SD) in the intervention group 41 (14) years, and in the control group 41 (12) years
Baseline asthma severity: "uncontrolled" asthma
Inclusion criteria: non‐smoking patients with new, uncontrolled asthma reporting to hospital
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Percentage withdrawn: not reported
Other allowed medication: not reported
Interventions Intervention summary: inhaler technique education delivered by respiratory therapist (no further details)
Control summary: routine inhaler technique instruction delivered by physician (no further details)
Outcomes Outcomes measured: inhaler technique and asthma control (ACT)
Technique assessment method used: not described
Notes Type of publication: conference abstract
Funding: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Described as 'randomised', but no details of sequence generation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk No description of procedures intended to blind participants or personnel to group assignment
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk No description of procedures intended to blind participants or personnel to group assignment; for patient‐reported outcomes, such as ACT, the participant was the outcome assessor
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Drop‐out not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk No prospective trial registration identified. Minimal details, as reported as conference abstract only. Unclear what "asthma control" percentage refers to. Number of participants included in analysis unclear
Other bias Low risk None noted