Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 13;2017(3):CD012286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012286.pub2

Vitari 2013.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: parallel‐group randomised controlled trial; blinding not stated
Duration: 4 weeks
Setting: Comprehensive Lung Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Trial registration: not reported
Participants Population: 43 people with asthma randomised to face‐to‐face demonstration + in‐check simulator (n = 22) or face‐to‐face demonstration (n = 21)
Age: not reported
Baseline asthma severity: not reported
Inclusion criteria: people with asthma new to the Comprehensive Lung Center
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Percentage withdrawn: 5% of participants withdrew from the intervention arm, and 10% from the control arm
Other allowed medication: not reported
Interventions Intervention summary: usual teaching with demonstrator models plus In‐Check to simulate resistance and measure inspiratory flow for each specific inhaler used
Control summary: usual teaching with demonstrator models
Outcomes Outcomes measured: inspiratory flow, number of correct steps met
Technique assessment method used: In‐Check inspiratory flow
Notes Type of publication: conference abstract
Funding: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "Twenty‐one subjects were randomized to traditional teaching (control arm) while 22 received In‐Check" ‐ no further details
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk No description of procedures intended to blind participants or personnel to group assignment
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk 'No description of procedures intended to blind outcome assessors to group allocation but the IN‐CHECK device provides an objective measure of inhalation technique"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Less than 10% drop ‐out in both groups
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk No prospective trial registration identified. Minimal details as reported as conference abstract only
Other bias Low risk None noted

ACQ: Asthma Control Questionnaire; ACT: Asthma Control Test; AQLQ: Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; AQOL: asthma quality of life; BAI: breath‐activated inhaler; BTS:British Thoracic Society; DPI: dry powder inhaler; ED: emergency department; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC: forced vital capacity; GINA: Global Initiative for Asthma; HCP: healthcare practitioner; ICS: inhaled corticosteroids; IF: inspiratory flow; ITT: intention‐to‐treat; IVC: inspiratory vital capacity; JMI: Jones Morbidity Index; LABA: long‐acting beta2‐agonist; MDI: metered dose inhaler; MTS: multi‐media touch screen system; PACQLQ: PAQLQ completed by parents of children; PAQLQ: Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; PEFR: peak expiratory flow rate; PIF: peak inspiratory flow; PIL: patient information leaflet; pMDI: pressurised metered dose inhaler; QOL: quality of life; RA: research assistant; SD: standard deviation; TH: Trainhaler; VC: verbal counselling.