Table 3.
Measurement invariance tests for religiosity
Configural factorial invariance | Strong factorial invariance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIC | BIC | Chi-Square Value | AIC | BIC | Chi-Square Value | − 2LL | − 2LL p value | |
Organizational religious participation | 10,552.20 | 10,693.93 | 359.71 | 10,545.44 | 10,656.81 | 348.78 | 10.93 | 0.090 |
Religious support | 9480.17 | 9613.713 | 357.01 | 9472.67 | 9576.53 | 367.47 | 10.43 | 0.108 |
Religiosity | 14,056.39 | 14,253.85 | 257.95 | 14,047.33 | 14,184.03 | 270.39 | 12.44 | 0.053 |
For model comparisons, the model tested in strong factorial invariance is more restrictive than, and is nested within, the model tested in configural factorial invariance. “Religiosity” indicates that tests were conducted on the second-order religiosity model where the first-order factors and items load directly onto the second-order construct, religiosity. AIC Akaike information criterion, BIC Bayesian information criterion; lower AIC and BIC values indicate better model fit. − 2LL = Log-likelihood, a non-significant p-value (p ≥ 0.05) indicates that the constrained model is preferred