Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Relig Health. 2018 Oct;57(5):1889–1904. doi: 10.1007/s10943-018-0605-3

Table 3.

Measurement invariance tests for religiosity

Configural factorial invariance Strong factorial invariance
AIC BIC Chi-Square Value AIC BIC Chi-Square Value − 2LL − 2LL p value
Organizational religious participation 10,552.20 10,693.93 359.71 10,545.44 10,656.81 348.78 10.93 0.090
Religious support 9480.17 9613.713 357.01 9472.67 9576.53 367.47 10.43 0.108
Religiosity 14,056.39 14,253.85 257.95 14,047.33 14,184.03 270.39 12.44 0.053

For model comparisons, the model tested in strong factorial invariance is more restrictive than, and is nested within, the model tested in configural factorial invariance. “Religiosity” indicates that tests were conducted on the second-order religiosity model where the first-order factors and items load directly onto the second-order construct, religiosity. AIC Akaike information criterion, BIC Bayesian information criterion; lower AIC and BIC values indicate better model fit. − 2LL = Log-likelihood, a non-significant p-value (p ≥ 0.05) indicates that the constrained model is preferred