Lou 2007.
Methods | Allocation: randomised, random number table method. Blindness: unclear. Duration: six weeks. Design: parallel. Setting: inpatient, China. |
|
Participants | Diagnosis: schizophrenia (CCMD‐3). PANSS of 60 or more.
N = 45.
Age: aripiprazole group: 50~67 years, mean = (56.1 ± 5.9) year, risperidone group: 49~70 years, mean = (54.6 ± 6.1) years. Gender: aripiprazole group: 11 male, 10 female; risperidone group: 11 male, 13 female. History: aripiprazole group:5~14 years, mean = (10.3 ± 2.6) years; risperidone group: 3~12 years, mean = (12.1 ± 2.2) years. Age at onset not reported. |
|
Interventions | 1. Aripiprazole: Dose range: 5‐30 mg/day. Mean dose: not reported. N = 21. 2. Risperidone: Dose range: 0.5‐4 mg/day. Mean dose: not reported. N = 24. | |
Outcomes | Global state: PANSS score decreased rate (recovery: ≥ 75%, markedly improved: 50%‐74%, improved: 25%‐49%, no effect: < 25%). Mental state: PANSS total score, PANSS positive subscale score, PANSS negative subscale score, PANSS general psychogenic pathological subscale score. Adverse effects. Unable to use ‐ Adverse effects: TESS score, ECG, use of benzodiazepines (no data). |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomised, random number table method. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear if outcome was assessed blindly. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No incomplete data. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Data on TESS total score, ECG, use of benzodiazepines were missing. |
Other bias | Low risk | None obvious. |