Wang 2006a.
Methods | Allocation: randomised, no further details. Blindness: unclear. Duration: eight weeks. Design: parallel. Location: inpatient, China. | |
Participants | Diagnosis: schizophrenia (CCMD‐3). PANSS of 60 or more. N = 60. Age: aripiprazole group: mean = (38.7 ± 8.47) years; clozapine group: mean = (35.56 ± 3.78) years. Gender: aripiprazole group: 16 male, 14 female; clozapine group: 14 male, 16 female. History: aripiprazole group: 1 month~10 years, mean = (12.6 ± 8.38) months; clozapine group: 3 months~9 years, mean = (12.15 ± 7.22) months. Age at onset not reported. | |
Interventions | 1. Aripiprazole: Dose range: 10‐30 mg/day. Mean dose:not reported. N = 30. 2. Clozapine: Dose range: 50‐400 mg/day. Mean dose:not reported. N = 30. | |
Outcomes | Global state: PANSS score decreased rate (recovery: ≥ 75%, markedly improved: 50%‐75%, improved: 25%‐50%, no effect: < 25%). Mental state: PANSS total score. PANSS positive subscale score, PANSS negative subscale score,PANSS general psychopathological subscale score. anxiety ‐ labelled as "adverse effect". Adverse effects. Unable to use ‐ Adverse effects: TESS total score, hepatorenal function (no data) . |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomised, no further details. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear if outcome was assessed blindly. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No incomplete data. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Although TESS was used to assess adverse effects, no data on score were available. Data on hepatorenal function were missing. |
Other bias | Low risk | None obvious. |