Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 2;2014(1):CD006569. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006569.pub5

Wang 2006a.

Methods Allocation: randomised, no further details.
 Blindness: unclear.
 Duration: eight weeks.
 Design: parallel.
 Location: inpatient, China.
Participants Diagnosis: schizophrenia (CCMD‐3). PANSS of 60 or more.
 N = 60.
 Age: aripiprazole group: mean = (38.7 ± 8.47) years; clozapine group: mean = (35.56 ± 3.78) years.
 Gender: aripiprazole group: 16 male, 14 female; clozapine group: 14 male, 16 female.
 History: aripiprazole group: 1 month~10 years, mean = (12.6 ± 8.38) months; clozapine group: 3 months~9 years, mean = (12.15 ± 7.22) months. Age at onset not reported.
Interventions 1. Aripiprazole: Dose range: 10‐30 mg/day. Mean dose:not reported. N = 30.
 2. Clozapine: Dose range: 50‐400 mg/day. Mean dose:not reported. N = 30.
Outcomes Global state: PANSS score decreased rate (recovery: ≥ 75%, markedly improved: 50%‐75%, improved: 25%‐50%, no effect: < 25%).
Mental state: PANSS total score. PANSS positive subscale score, PANSS negative subscale score,PANSS general psychopathological subscale score. anxiety ‐ labelled as "adverse effect".
Adverse effects.
Unable to use ‐
 Adverse effects: TESS total score, hepatorenal function (no data) .
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised, no further details.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear if outcome was assessed blindly.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No incomplete data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Although TESS was used to assess adverse effects, no data on score were available. Data on hepatorenal function were missing.
Other bias Low risk None obvious.