Yan 2008.
Methods | Allocation: randomised, no further details. Blindness: unclear. Duration: eight weeks. Design: parallel. Setting: inpatient and outpatient, China. |
|
Participants | Diagnosis: schizophrenia (CCMD‐3). PANSS of 60 or more.
N = 60.
Age: aripiprazole group: mean = (13. 0 ± 2. 3) years; risperidone group: mean = (13. 0 ± 2. 6) years. Gender: aripiprazole group: 14 male, 16 female; risperidone group: 13 male, 17 female. History: aripiprazole group: mean = (10. 6 ± 6. 0) years; risperidone group: mean = (8. 2 ± 5. 2) years. Age at onset not reported. |
|
Interventions | 1. Aripiprazole: Dose range: 2.5‐25 mg/day. Mean dose: not reported. N = 30. 2. Risperidone: Dose range: 0.5‐6 mg/day. Mean dose: not reported. N = 30. | |
Outcomes | Global state: PANSS score decreased rate (recovery: ≥ 75%, markedly improved: 50%‐75%, improved: 25%‐50%, no effect: < 25%). CGI‐SI score. Mental state: PANSS total score, PANSS positive subscale score, PANSS negative subscale score, PANSS general pathological subscale score. Leaving the study early: no patient. Adverse effects. Unable to use‐ Adverse effects: TESS score, blood routine, hepatorenal function, EEG, and weight (no data). |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomised, no further details. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear if outcome was assessed blindly. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No incomplete data. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Although TESS was used to assess adverse effects, no data on scores were available. Data on blood routine, hepatorenal function, EEG, and weight were missing. |
Other bias | Low risk | None obvious. |