Zhu 2005.
Methods | Allocation: randomised, no further details. Blindness: single. Duration: eight weeks. Design: parallel. Setting: inpatient and outpatient, China. |
|
Participants | Diagnosis: schizophrenia (CCMD‐3). BPRS total score of 40 or more. N = 80. Age: aripiprazole group: 16~57 years, mean = (28.3 ± 10.2) years; clozapine group: 17~58 years, mean = (27.8 ± 8.2) years. Gender: aripiprazole group: 22 M, 18 F; clozapine group: 20 M, 20 F. History: aripiprazole group: 2 months~8 years, mean = (6.2 ± 3.7) years; clozapine group: 3 months~9 years, mean = (6.7 ± 5.8) years. Age at onset not reported. | |
Interventions | 1. Aripiprazole: Dose range: 5‐20 mg/day. Mean dose: not reported. N = 40. 2. Clozapine: Dose range: 50‐500 mg/day. Mean dose: not reported. N = 40. | |
Outcomes | Global state: PANSS score decreased rate (markedly improved: ≥60%, improved: 20%‐59%, no effect: < 20%). Mental state: PANSS total score. PANSS positive subscale score, PANSS negative subscale score, PANSS general pathological subscale score. BPRS total score. Adverse effects. |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomised, no further details. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Single blind, but whether the blindness was performed well was unclear. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear if outcome was assessed blindly. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | There were drop‐outs, but specific digital was not obtained. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Data on blood and urine routine, liver function were missing. |
Other bias | Low risk | None obvious. |