Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 10;4(1):34. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed4010034

Table 1.

Distribution of livestock samples from study sites.

Farms
n = 35
Number of Rectal Samples per Farm (Percentage)
n = 4248
Number of Serum Samples per Farm (Percentage)
n = 592
AC 100 (2.4) 20 (3.4)
AF 77 (1.8) 2 (0.3)
AGD 618 (14.5) 61 (10.3)
AGV 132 (3.1) 30 (5.1)
AGB 52 (1.2) -
AGO 134 (3.2) -
AKA 24 (0.6) 2 (0.3)
AKI 70 (1.6) 5 (0.8)
AKU 148 (3.5) 14 (2.4)
AA 284 (6.7) 56 (9.5)
AI 193 (4.5) 108 (18.2)
ANY ** 70 (1.6) -
ATY 108 (2.5) -
ATA 85 (2) -
AW 1 (0) -
AZ 81 (1.9) -
ESBS 410 (9.7) 26 (4.4)
IB 50 (1.2) 9 (1.5)
JO 99 (2.3) 10 (1.7)
KB 33 (0.8) 19 (3.2)
KGBS ** 552 (13) 75 (12.7)
KAS ** 58 (1.4) 58 (9.8)
KT 51 (1.2) -
KF 290 (6.8) 20 (3.4)
LB 137 (3.2) -
LF 40 (0.9) 10 (1.7)
MS ** 28 (0.7) -
NS 108 (2.5) -
NF 26 (0.6) 26 (4.4)
PT 65 (1.5) 4 (0.7)
SY 23 (0.5) 3 (0.5)
TH 16 (0.4) 15 (2.5)
WF 45 (1.1) 10 (1.7)
YA 17 (0.4) 3 (0.5)
ZM 23 (0.5) 6 (1)

N: Total number of samples collected. ** No data on bat proximity to livestock.