Table 3.
Comparisons of water retention.
| Block-Type PUSX with Different Silicone Chain Lengths | PU | Si02 | Si01 | Si03 | Si04 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanofiber Water Retention (%) | 280.0 ± 40.0 | 27.0 ± 11.0 | 19.0 ± 8.1 | 11.0 ± 4.1 | 12.0 ± 2.5 |
| Film Water Retention (%) | 2.3 ± 1.5 | 2.7 ± 1.1 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 5.8 ± 5.0 | 3.7 ± 1.1 |
| Block-type PUSX with Different Silicone Concentrations | PU | Si01 | Si01-20 | Si01-40 | Si01-59 |
| Nanofiber Water Retention (%) | 280.0 ± 40.0 | 19.0 ± 8.1 | 4.7 ± 3.1 | 2.7 ± 0.9 | 6.9 ± 6.0 |
| Film Water Retention (%) | 2.3 ± 1.5 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 3.7 ± 0.7 | 2.7 ± 1.0 | 2.9 ± 2.3 |
| Graft-Type PUSX | PU | Si05 | Si06 | Si07 | Si08 |
| Nanofiber Water Retention (%) | 280.0 ± 40.0 | 169.0 ± 23.3 | 196.0 ± 28.8 | 165.0 ± 55.0 | 200.0 ± 13.5 |
| Film Water Retention (%) | 2.3 ± 1.5 | 2.3 ± 2.6 | 6.6 ± 7.5 | 6.8 ± 3.8 | 1.7 ± 0.9 |