Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):46–50. doi: 10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_327_18

Supplementary Table 2.

Qualitative evaluation of the included studies

Author/date Pieri et al. 2008 Pang et al. 2016 Bulgin and Hodzic 2015 Aimetti et al. 2017 Cucchi and Ghensi 2014 Cechetti et al. 2014 Ludovichetti et al. 2011 Felice et al. 2009 Gatti et al. 2014 Li et al. 2013 Kim and Leem 2014
Biomaterials Anorganic bovine bone and autogenous bone (30:70), micro-mesh Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix (AutoBT), Bio-Oss BMMNCs, OSferion (β-TCP) granules Collagen sponge, high-density d-PTFE membrane Corticocancelous porcine-derived bone, d-PTFE membrane (without autogenous bone) Deproteinized bovine bone, free gingival graft Flexible cortical equine bone sheet (without GBR membrane) Iliac crest bone versus bovine anorganic bone PerioGlas (bioactive glass) mixed with autogenous bone Xenogenous bone block (Bio-Oss) onlay graft Xenograft material and bone fragments from traumatic site, resorbable collagen membrane or titanium mesh
Study design Case series Prospective randomized clinical trial Case series Case report Case report Case report Case series Randomized clinical trial Case series Case series Case series
Study sample 16 patients, 44 implant abutments AutoBT in 21 sites of 15 patients, Bio-Oss in 12 sites of 9 patients 3 patients, 17 implant abutments 1 patient, no implant abutment 1 patient, 1 implant abutment 1 patient, 1 implant abutment 18 patients, 49 implant abutments 10 patients, 20 implant abutments 3 patients, 5 implant abutments 9 patients, 18 implant abutments 3 patients, 10 implant abutments

PTFE: Polytetrafluoroethylene, β-TCP: Beta-tricalcium phosphate, GBR: Guided bone regeneration