Table 3.
Analysis of Easy Hard Word Identification Condition with Voiced Obstruents (VLNC+V) as base, model converged
| Estimate | SE | Z | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | −0.15 | 0.32 | −0.45 | 0.6524 |
| Easy vs. Hard | −1.09 | 0.30 | −3.65 | 0.0003*** |
| Comparisons with VLNC+V Condition | ||||
| Unrestricted | −0.21 | 0.40 | −0.52 | 0.603 |
| VLNC-V | −0.72 | 0.41 | −1.77 | 0.077 |
| VLF-V | −1.08 | 0.41 | −2.66 | 0.008** |
| VLF+V | −0.83 | 0.41 | −2.03 | 0.043* |
| VLN | −1.10 | 0.41 | −2.71 | 0.007** |
| VL | −0.38 | 0.41 | −0.92 | 0.357 |
| none | −0.96 | 0.42 | −2.30 | 0.021* |
Results of a logistic/binomial mixed-effects regression analysis of the fixed effects of exposure condition (8 levels) on identification of word type (Easy or Hard). Here, the effects relative to the exposure conditions containing Voiced Obstruent consonants (VLNC+V) are shown. Again, the fixed effect of Word Type was contrast coded with Easy as the reference level (−0.5, 0.5). Most of the exposure conditions differed from the VLNC+V condition, with the exception of the Unrestricted and VL conditions.