Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 19.
Published in final edited form as: Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Feb 26;33(9):1083–1091. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1442580

Table 3.

Analysis of Easy Hard Word Identification Condition with Voiced Obstruents (VLNC+V) as base, model converged

Estimate SE Z p
Intercept −0.15 0.32 −0.45 0.6524
Easy vs. Hard −1.09 0.30 −3.65 0.0003***
Comparisons with VLNC+V Condition
Unrestricted −0.21 0.40 −0.52 0.603
VLNC-V −0.72 0.41 −1.77 0.077
VLF-V −1.08 0.41 −2.66 0.008**
VLF+V −0.83 0.41 −2.03 0.043*
VLN −1.10 0.41 −2.71 0.007**
VL −0.38 0.41 −0.92 0.357
none −0.96 0.42 −2.30 0.021*

Results of a logistic/binomial mixed-effects regression analysis of the fixed effects of exposure condition (8 levels) on identification of word type (Easy or Hard). Here, the effects relative to the exposure conditions containing Voiced Obstruent consonants (VLNC+V) are shown. Again, the fixed effect of Word Type was contrast coded with Easy as the reference level (−0.5, 0.5). Most of the exposure conditions differed from the VLNC+V condition, with the exception of the Unrestricted and VL conditions.