Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 19.
Published in final edited form as: Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Feb 26;33(9):1083–1091. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1442580

Table 6.

Phoneme Composition of the Easy/Hard Word Lists

tally Phoneme Class
3 vowels, liquids
14 vowels, liquids, nasals
5 vowels, liquids, voiced fricatives
23 vowels, liquids, nasals, voiceless fricatives
26 vowels, liquids, nasals, voiced obstruents
25 vowels, liquids, nasals, voiceless obstruents
148 unrestricted

A back-of-the-envelope method of predicting intelligibility gain from shared segmental properties. The right column shows the feature restriction exhibited of the sentences that were used in each exposure condition. The left column shows the tally of words (out of 148) in the Easy/Hard word lists exhibiting the features of the exposure sentences. A prediction by the incidence of features identifies three conditions with approximately equal benefit: vowels, liquids, nasals, voiceless fricatives; vowels, liquids, nasals, voiced obstruents; and, vowels, liquids, nasals, voiceless obstruents. However, facilitation was only observed in one of these conditions: vowels, liquids, nasals, voiced obstruents. (See Discussion.)