Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 1;6(1):130–139. doi: 10.23907/2016.014

Table 1:

A Comparison of Scenarios Which Can Cause Confusion Regarding the Number of Entrances and Exits and Projectiles Visualized on Initial Imaging at Autopsy

Situations Which Suggest That a Bullet/Projectile is Unaccounted for During Initial Exam and Imaging Situations Which Suggest That There are Too Many Bullets/Projectiles (or Too Many Exit Wounds) During Initial Exam and Imaging
Misinterpretation of entrance/exit wound(s) Misinterpretation of entrance/exit wound(s)
Overlooking/missing a hidden or subtle exit wound Overlooking/missing a hidden or subtle entrance wound
Graze wound misidentified as an entrance wound Graze wound misidentified as an exit wound
Shored exit wound (1415) Partial or incomplete exit wound
The presence of a defect which mimics a gun shot wound entrance (1617) The presence of a defect which mimics a gun shot wound exit (1617)
Misalignment of radiograph such that area with bullet/projectile is missed Misinterpreting an object on radiograph as a bullet/projectile
Bullet embolus (18-22) Tandem bullet
Overlooking a bullet/projectile on radiograph due to decreased subject contrast and summation artifact (23) Separation/fragmentation of bullet/projectile after entering body (30)
Prior surgical removal (or other movement) of bullet/projectile (+/- relying on antemortem radiographs) (24) Multiple bullets/projectiles within a single cartridge (33,34)
Injury produced by blank cartridge (25-27) Retained bullet (17)
Multiple bullets/projectiles exiting the same exit defect (28) Multiple bullets/projectiles (from separate shots) entering the same entrance defect (3132)
Bullet/projectile ricochet with subsequent exit via the entrance wound (29) Misinterpreting an incomplete shored exit wound as a “complete” shored exit wound (15)