Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 19;14(4):e0214599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214599

Table 2. Efficacy of Treatment in the ED-SCLC patients (n = 141).

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
(n = 31) (n = 18) (n = 15) (n = 77)
Regimen of initial chemotherapy, n (%)
    CDDP + CPT 3 (9.7) 1 (5.6) 3 (20.0) 8 (10.4)
    CDDP + ETP 0 (0) 2 (11.1) 0 (0) 4 (5.2)
    CBDCA + CPT 1 (3.2) 1 (5.6) 0 (0) 0 (0)
    CBDCA + ETP 12 (38.7) 3 (16.7) 3 (20.0) 19 (24.7)
    AMR 11 (35.5) 8 (44.4) 7 (46.7) 36 (46.8)
    CPT + AMR 3 (9.7) 1 (5.6) 2 (13.3) 4 (5.2)
    Others* 1 (3.2) 2 (11.1) 0 (0) 6 (7.8)
Number of regimen administered, n (%)
    1 6 (19.4) 8 (44.4) 6 (40.0) 42 (54.5)
    2 12 (38.7) 6 (33.3) 7 (46.7) 23 (29.9)
    3 13 (41.9) 4 (22.3) 2 (13.3) 12 (15.6)
Response to initial chemotherapy, n (%)
    Partial response 24 (77.4) 10 (55.6) 8 (53.3) 49 (63.6)
    Stable disease 4 (12.9) 4 (22.2) 4 (26.7) 10 (13.0)
    Progressive disease 1 (3.2) 1 (5.6) 3 (20.0) 10 (13.0)
    Not evaluated 2 (6.5) 3 (16.7) 0 (0) 8 (10.4)
Thoracic radiotherapy, n (%)
    Yes 6 (19.4) 1 (5.6) 3 (16.7) 7 (9.1)
    No 25 (80.6) 17 (94.4) 12 (83.3) 70 (90.9)

Note: CDDP, cisplatin; CPT, irinotecan; ETP, etoposide; CBDCA, carboplatin; AMR, amrubicin