Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 26;53:34. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000597

Table 1. Characteristics of the implementation of the National School Feeding Program according to reports of the operating agents from 38 cities of Rio de Janeiro.

Characteristic Sample Total p*; power

School feeding administrator Members of CAE Nutritionists




n = 12 n = 45 n = 43 n = 100
Insufficient number of nutritionists         0.008; 0.80
Yes 5 (26.3%) 11 (57.9%) 3 (15.8%) 19 (19.0%)  
No 6 (7.6%) 34 (43.0%) 39 (49.4%) 79 (79.0%)  
No answer 1 (50.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (50.0%) 2 (2.0%)  
Purchase of family farming products         0.080; 0.51
Over 30% 8 (17.0%) 17 (36.2%) 22 (46.8%) 47 (47.0%)  
Below 30% 1 (5.0%) 13 (65.0%) 6 (30.0%) 20 (20.0%)  
No answer 3 (9.0%) 15 (45.5%) 15 (45.5%) 33 (33.0%)  
Purchase of organics         0.390; 0.21
Yes 0 (0.0%) 5 (45.5%) 6 (54.5%) 11 (11.0%)  
No 11 (14.2%) 33 (42.9%) 33 (42.9%) 77 (77.0%)  
No answer 1 (8.4%) 7 (58.3%) 4 (33.3%) 12 (12.0%)  
Food and nutritional education activities         0.289; 0.27
Yes 11 (13.4%) 34 (41.5%) 37 (45.1%) 82 (82.0%)  
No 1 (6.3%) 10 (62.5%) 5 (31.3%) 16 (16.0%)  
No answer 0 (0.0%) 1 (50.0%) 1 (50.0%) 2 (2.0%)  
Activity of CAE         0.009; 0.86
Good 6 (9.1%) 36 (54.5%) 24 (36.4%) 66 (66.0%)  
Regular 6 (23.1%) 9 (34.6%) 11 (42.3%) 26 (26.0%)  
Bad 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 6 (100.0%) 6 (6.0%)  
No answer 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (100.0%) 2 (2.0%)  

CAE: School Feeding Board

Values are presented in absolute and relative frequency (%).

Values with statistical significance are presented in bold.

* Chi-square test for association among categorical variables.