Table 1. Characteristics of the implementation of the National School Feeding Program according to reports of the operating agents from 38 cities of Rio de Janeiro.
Characteristic | Sample | Total | p*; power | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
School feeding administrator | Members of CAE | Nutritionists | |||
|
|
|
|
||
n = 12 | n = 45 | n = 43 | n = 100 | ||
Insufficient number of nutritionists | 0.008; 0.80 | ||||
Yes | 5 (26.3%) | 11 (57.9%) | 3 (15.8%) | 19 (19.0%) | |
No | 6 (7.6%) | 34 (43.0%) | 39 (49.4%) | 79 (79.0%) | |
No answer | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 2 (2.0%) | |
Purchase of family farming products | 0.080; 0.51 | ||||
Over 30% | 8 (17.0%) | 17 (36.2%) | 22 (46.8%) | 47 (47.0%) | |
Below 30% | 1 (5.0%) | 13 (65.0%) | 6 (30.0%) | 20 (20.0%) | |
No answer | 3 (9.0%) | 15 (45.5%) | 15 (45.5%) | 33 (33.0%) | |
Purchase of organics | 0.390; 0.21 | ||||
Yes | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (45.5%) | 6 (54.5%) | 11 (11.0%) | |
No | 11 (14.2%) | 33 (42.9%) | 33 (42.9%) | 77 (77.0%) | |
No answer | 1 (8.4%) | 7 (58.3%) | 4 (33.3%) | 12 (12.0%) | |
Food and nutritional education activities | 0.289; 0.27 | ||||
Yes | 11 (13.4%) | 34 (41.5%) | 37 (45.1%) | 82 (82.0%) | |
No | 1 (6.3%) | 10 (62.5%) | 5 (31.3%) | 16 (16.0%) | |
No answer | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 2 (2.0%) | |
Activity of CAE | 0.009; 0.86 | ||||
Good | 6 (9.1%) | 36 (54.5%) | 24 (36.4%) | 66 (66.0%) | |
Regular | 6 (23.1%) | 9 (34.6%) | 11 (42.3%) | 26 (26.0%) | |
Bad | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (100.0%) | 6 (6.0%) | |
No answer | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (100.0%) | 2 (2.0%) |
CAE: School Feeding Board
Values are presented in absolute and relative frequency (%).
Values with statistical significance are presented in bold.
* Chi-square test for association among categorical variables.