Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 14;8(6):e009124. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009124

Table 6.

Results for Mean and RMS Error in LVV Over the Physiologic Volume Range, and EF and % Error in EF Using 3D Surface Fitting for LV Volume Estimation Based on 12 Short‐Axis Plus 12‐Long‐Axis Slices (24 Slices Total), and Variants Using 6 and 4 Slices in Each View (Labeled 12 and 8 Slice Variants)

3D Surface Fitting 24 Slices 12 Slices Var. 1 12 Slices Var. 2 12 Slices Mean 8 Slices Var. 1 8 Slices Var. 2 8 Slices Var. 3 8 Slices Mean
Mean LVV error, mL 0.36 0.43 0.47 0.45 0.55 −0.03 0.89 0.47
Mean error, % 0.66 0.78 0.86 0.82 0.99 −0.05 1.60 0.85
RMS error, % 1.11 1.27 1.41 1.34 1.39 0.84 2.25 1.49
EF 0.394 0.388 0.394 0.391 0.431 0.404 0.378 0.391
EF error, % 2.1 3.7 2.1 2.9 1.9 −0.3 6.1 2.9

3D indicates 3 dimensional; EF, ejection fraction; LVV, left ventricular cavity volume; RMS, root mean square.