Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 23;9(3):e023316. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023316

Table 4.

Comparison between PATS (clinical) and PAS (administrative) data at University Hospital Birmingham in the financial years 2012–2015

Procedure group Procedure Match negative Match positive Mismatch Total match (%)
CABG CABG 941 1118 1 100
Valve Aortic 1340 679 41 94
TAVI 1923 124 13 91
Mitral repair 1913 121 26 82
Mitral replace 1932 104 24 81
Pulmonary 2010 40 10 80
Tricuspid 1903 148 9 94
Major aortic Major aortic 1818 220 22 91
Transplant Transplant 1993 67 0 100
Other Other procedures 1676 267 117 70
AF surgery 1939 85 36 70
ASD closure 2017 19 24 44
VSD closure 2047 4 9 31
LV anneurysectomy 2047 1 12 8
Myectomy 2049 3 8 27
Primary VAD 2023 31 6 84
Epicardial pacemaker vs PAS w/temp flag 1717 4 339 1
Epicardial pacemaker vs PAS w/no temp flag 2038 4 18 18

Match negative, procedure in neither PATS nor PAS; Match positive, procedure in PATS and PAS; Mismatch, procedure in PATS only or PAS only; Total match, positive/(positive+mismatch).

AF, atrial fibrillation; ASD, atrial septal device; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; LV, left ventricle; PAS, Patient Administrative System; PATS, Patient Administrative and Tracking System; TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation; VAD, ventricular assist defect; VSD, ventricular septal defect.