Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 26;9(3):e025866. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025866

Table 2.

Relationships between baseline susceptibility of parents and change in vaccination views post exposure to media messages (n=411)

Change, (%) No change, (%) P value* ORs (95% CI)
Willingness to vaccinate
 Trump Susceptible (n=313) 76 (24.3) 237 (75.7) 0.006 2.54 (1.29 to 5.00)
Fixed view (n=98) 11 (11.2) 87 (88.8)
Total (n=411) 87 (21.2) 324 (78.8)
 Hanson Susceptible (n=313) 66 (21.1) 247 (78.9) 0.008 2.64 (1.26 to 5.52)
Fixed view (n=98) 9 (9.2) 89 (90.8)
Total (n=411) 75 (18.2) 336 (81.8)
 Gannon Susceptible (n=313) 66 (21.1) 247 (78.9) 0.008 2.64 (1.26 to 5.52)
Fixed view (n=98) 9 (9.2) 89 (90.8)
Total (n=411) 75 (18.2) 336 (81.8)
More hesitant, (%) Not more hesitant, (%) P value* ORs (95% CI)
Increased vaccine hesitancy
 Trump Susceptible (n=313) 72 (23.0) 241 (77.0) 0.021 2.14 (1.11 to 4.14)
Fixed view (n=98) 12 (12.2) 86 (87.8)
Total (n=411) 84 (20.4) 327 (79.6)
 Hanson Susceptible (n=313) 77 (24.6) 236 (75.4) 0.010 2.34 (1.21 to 4.50)
Fixed view (n=98) 12 (12.2) 86 (87.8)
Total (n=411) 89 (21.7) 322 (78.3)
 Gannon Susceptible (n=313) 49 (15.7) 264 (84.3) 0.179 1.63 (0.79 to 3.36)
Fixed view (n=98) 10 (10.2) 88 (89.8)
Total (n=411) 59 (14.4) 352 (85.6)

*P value for paired X2 test.