Table 1.
Species | P | ± | % |
Superinvasive profiles | |||
Technomyrmex difficilis | 0.87 | 0.02 | 100 |
Lasius neglectus | 0.87 | 0.02 | 100 |
Solenopsis geminata | 0.87 | 0.02 | 100 |
Solenopsis invicta | 0.87 | 0.02 | 100 |
Technomyrmex albipes | 0.87 | 0.02 | 100 |
Trichomyrmex destructor | 0.87 | 0.02 | 100 |
Lepisiota canescens | 0.83 | 0.01 | 100 |
Anoplolepis gracilipes | 0.83 | 0.01 | 100 |
Linepithema humile | 0.83 | 0.01 | 100 |
Monomorium pharaonis | 0.83 | 0.01 | 100 |
Myrmica rubra | 0.83 | 0.01 | 100 |
Nylanderia pubens | 0.83 | 0.01 | 100 |
Paratrechina longicornis | 0.83 | 0.01 | 100 |
Tapinoma melanocephalum | 0.83 | 0.01 | 100 |
Wasmannia auropunctata | 0.83 | 0.01 | 100 |
Invasive profiles | |||
Pheidole megacephala | 0.39 | 0.04 | 100 |
Anoplolepis custodiens | 0.38 | 0.04 | 98 |
Formica yessensis | 0.23 | 0.01 | 100 |
Tapinoma litorale | 0.17 | 0.01 | 100 |
Tapinoma sessile | 0.17 | 0.01 | 100 |
Brachyponera chinensis | 0.17 | 0.01 | 100 |
Solenopsis richteri | 0.17 | 0.01 | 100 |
Ochetellus glaber | 0.17 | 0.16 | 100 |
Lasius fuliginosus | 0.14 | 0.02 | 100 |
Aphaenogaster spinosa | 0.13 | 0.01 | 100 |
Cardiocondyla emeryi | 0.13 | 0.01 | 100 |
Cardiocondyla minutior | 0.13 | 0.01 | 100 |
Dolichoderus bispinosus | 0.13 | 0.01 | 100 |
Lasius sabularum | 0.13 | 0.01 | 100 |
Monomorium minimum | 0.13 | 0.01 | 100 |
Neivamyrmexnigrescens | 0.13 | 0.01 | 100 |
Neivamyrmex pilosus | 0.13 | 0.01 | 100 |
Tetramorium bicarinatum | 0.13 | 0.01 | 100 |
Tetramorium simillimum | 0.13 | 0.01 | 100 |
Monomorium floricola | 0.13 | 0.01 | 100 |
Solenopsis papuana | 0.13 | 0.01 | 100 |
Acromyrmex octospinosus | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100 |
“P”: invasiveness probability (mean: 100 models); “±”: invasiveness variability (SD: 100 models); “%”: percentage of models. Note that the values of A. octospinosus are P = 0.0001 ± 9.07E-05.