Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurol Sci. 2019 Mar 19;400:104–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.03.016

Table 4.

Criterion validity and level of agreement between the RAVLT and CVLT-II against their respective standardized scores.

1.5 SD below the mean 2.0 SD below the mean
RAVLT CVLT-II RAVLT CVLT-II
Trial 1 AUC 0.80 (0.69, 0.90) 0.81 (0.69, 0.93) 0.85 (0.74, 0.96) 0.80 (0.63, 0.98)
Cut-off 5 4 5 4
Sensitivity 0.75 (0.47, 0.92) 0.60 (0.33, 0.83) 0.89 (0.51, 0.99) 0.67 (0.31, 0.91)
Specificity 0.69 (0.58, 0.78) 0.81 (0.71, 0.89) 0.67 (0.56, 0.76) 0.79 (0.69, 0.87)
PPV 0.32 (0.18, 0.49) 0.36 (0.19, 0.57) 0.21 (0.10, 0.38) 0.24 (0.10, 0.46)
NPV 0.94 (0.84, 0.98) 0.92 (0.83, 0.97) 0.98 (0.90, 1.00) 0.96 (0.88, 0.99)
κ 0.21 0.21
Trials 1+ 2 AUC 0.87 (0.78, 0.95) 0.94 (0.88, 0.99) 0.85 (0.74, 0.96) 0.93 (0.83, 1.00)
Cut-off 12 12 13 11
Sensitivity 0.75 (0.47, 0.92) 0.93 (0.66, 0.97) 0.78 (0.40, 0.96) 0.78 (0.40, 0.96)
Specificity 0.81 (0.71, 0.88) 0.84 (0.74, 0.90) 0.67 (0.56, 0.76) 0.85 (0.75, 0.91)
PPV 0.43 (0.25, 0.63) 0.50 (0.31, 0.69) 0.19 (0.09, 0.36) 0.33 (0.15, 0.57)
NPV 0.94 (0.86, 0.98) 0.99 (0.91, 1.00) 0.97 (0.88, 0.99) 0.98 (0.90, 1.00)
κ 0.41 0.20
Total
Learning
AUC 0.96 (0.92, 0.99) 1.00 (0.97, 1.00) 0.95 (0.90, 1.00) 1.00 (1.00, 1.00)
Cut-off 42 39 42 35
Sensitivity 0.94 (0.68, 1.00) 0.93 (0.66, 1.00) 1.00 (0.63, 1.00) 1.00 (0.63, 1.00)
Specificity 0.85 (0.75, 0.91) 0.92 (0.83, 0.96) 0.79 (0.69, 0.87) 0.97 (0.90, 0.99)
PPV 0.54 (0.34, 0.72) 0.67 (0.43, 0.85) 0.32 (0.17, 0.52) 0.75 (0.43, 0.93)
NPV 0.98 (0.91, 1.00) 0.99 (0.92, 1.00) 1.00 (0.94, 1.00) 1.00 (0.95, 1.00)
κ 0.38 0.22

Notes. 95% confidence intervals are presented in parentheses.

Abbreviations: AUC= area under the curve; CVLT-II = California Verbal Learning Test - II; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV: = positive predictive value; RAVLT = Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test.