Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Gambl Stud. 2019 Mar;35(1):79–92. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9806-7

Table 2.

Engagement in Gambling Behaviors and Problem Gambling among Minnesota Student Survey Participants by Gender Identity (N = 80,929)

TGD
(n = 2,168)
Cisgender
(n = 78,761)

Past year gambling behaviors n % n % Chi square, p-value, d

Played cards, bet on sports/games 460 23.7 20,033 27.4 12.95, <.001, d = 0.03
Bought lottery tickets/scratch offs 224 11.6 6,994 9.6 8.79, .003, d = 0.03
Gambled in a casino 84 4.3 1,481 2.0 49.56, <.001, d = 0.05
Gambled for money online 110 5.7 2,218 3.0 44.02, <.001, d = 0.05
Any gambling behavior 571 29.6 23,081 31.7 3.62, .06, d = 0.01

Problem gambling1 (n = 571) (n = 23,081)

BAGS score of 4+ for prevalence estimate 31 5.7 385 1.8 44.27, <.001, d = 0.08
BAGS score of 2+ for further assessment 61 11.2 883 4.1 66.21, <.001, d = 0.11

Notes. TGD = transgender and gender diverse. BAGS = Brief Adolescent Gambling Screen. d = Cohen’s d. Numbers do not sum to sample sizes because of missing data.

1

Problem gambling screener only asked of students who reported any gambling in past year.