Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nurs Health Sci. 2018 Oct 21;21(2):164–170. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12576

Table 2.

Workplace Qualities that Support or Hinder Providing Comprehensive OT Services to the Oncology Population

Barriers Facilitators
Factor Examples n (%) (N=120) Examples n (%) (N=112)
Time & Logistics 67 (55.8) 16 (14.3)
Time constraints; high caseload/not enough staff; productivity requirements Adequate time to see patients, flexible scheduling, electronic medical records
Resources Total for category 40 (33.3) Total for category 48 (42.9)
 Education/Training Need for oncology-specific training, mentoring, and education programs 17 (14.3) Continuing education, training and mentoring opportunities 23 (20.5)
 Equipment/Space Lack of supplies, space, privacy 19 (15.8) Provides needed equipment and space 11 (9.8)
 Oncology-Specific Resources Difficulty ordering & delay for equipment (e.g., compression garments) 2 (1.7) Separate oncology unit, gym for BMT clients, lymphedema program, compression garments on site 9 (8.0)
 Access to Other Disciplines Lack of social services, psychologist 2 (1.7) Psychologist, social services, dietician, etc. on site 5 (4.5)
Healthcare Team / Role of OT 29 (24.2) 83 (74.1)
No interdisciplinary team, poor team communication / other disciplines’ limited understanding of OT, lack of appropriate referrals Multidisciplinary team approach, team communication / other disciplines’ support & advocate for OT services, appropriate & regular referrals
Patient Population (Medical Status) 17 (14.2) 0 (0.0)
Patients too ill for treatment, medical complexity, fatigue N/A
Billing / Reimbursement 10 (8.3) 3 (2.7)
Billing, insurance approval and verification Independence from insurance, outside money to provide free programs
Institutional Culture 4 (3.3) 27 (25.2)
Focus on ADLs, triage and prioritize other patients; community/home outreach Individualized, innovative, direct 1:1 treatment; autonomy; community/home outreach
None 7 (5.8) 0 (0.0)
No barriers N/A

Note: Percentages do not sum to 100% as participants could report multiple answers