Table 7.
Path analysis results for different industrial groups.
| Industry | Food Processing (n = 37) |
Tea Industry (n = 22) |
Rural Organizaiton (n = 30) |
Grocery (n = 24) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | T-value | β | T-value | β | T-value | β | T-value | |
| H1: CI →CS | 0.317 | 2.046* | 0.510 | 2.173* | 0.361 | 1.646 | 0.431 | 1.861 |
| H2: SQ→CI | 0.482 | 2.462* | 0.485 | 2.148* | 0.516 | 3.984*** | 0.491 | 1.881 |
| H3: SQ→CS | 0.467 | 2.840** | 0.277 | 1.011 | 0.547 | 2.788** | 0.512 | 2.732** |
| H4: CS→BI | 0.525 | 2.924** | 0.746 | 4.969*** | 0.539 | 3.258** | 0.710 | 5.639*** |
| Mediation Effect | β = 0.619(VAF = 24%) | No | No | No | ||||
Note: *P < 0.05(T≧1.96); **P < 0.01(T≧2.58); ***P < 0.001(T ≧3.29).