Skip to main content
. 2019 May;6(5):403–417. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30090-2

Table 2.

Legislative frameworks related to involuntary hospitalisation, by country

Criteria for involuntary hospitalisation
Person able to issue an order* Legal requirements
Treatment while hospitalised
Which conditions (diagnoses) are eligible? Does the person need to pose a risk to themselves or others? Does the person need to not have capacity? Does the condition need to be treatable? Legal representative must be present or consulted? Right to repeal or tribunal? Next of kin or nearest relative must be consulted? Separate assessment and treatment orders? Is treatment required?
Australia Mental illness (three states reviewed) or mental disorder (five states reviewed) Yes (eight states reviewed) NA (two states reviewed); yes (six states reviewed) For assessment or treatment orders (three states reviewed); yes (five states reviewed) Police (four), clinician (two), and legal authority (two; emergency order); clinician (six) and legal authority (two; assessments of short-term orders); clinician (three) and legal authority (five; treatment or long-term order) No (eight states reviewed) Yes (eight states reviewed) No (five states reviewed); right to be consulted (three states reviewed) Yes (eight states reviewed) No (one state reviewed); yes (seven states reviewed)
Austria Mental illness Yes NA No Police (emergency order); clinician (assessments or short-term order); and legal authority (treatment or long-term order) No, but judge must visit the patient in hospital within 4 days Yes No No No
Belgium Mental illness Yes NA No Police (emergency order); legal authority (assessments or short-term order); legal authority (treatment or long-term order) No, but within 10 days of the prosecutor's decision to detain, the judge visits the patient to make a final decision Only if manifestly ill founded Right to be informed throughout the process; right to request and end detention, and right to appeal No Yes, if reason for detention was treatment
Cyprus Severe mental disorder Only in relation to detention by police NA NA Police (emergency order); legal authority (assessments or short-term order); legal authority (treatment or long-term order) No Yes No No No
Denmark ‘Insanity’ or similar condition No NA Yes, if reason for detention is treatment Police and clinician (emergency order); clinician (assessment or short-term order); clinician (treatment or long-term order) No Yes Patient is consulted on whether to involve the next of kin or family No Yes, if reason for detention was treatment
England and Wales (as part of one legal jurisdiction) Mental disorder Yes No Yes, but does not apply to assessment or emergency orders Police and clinician (emergency order); clinician (assessment or short-term order); clinician (treatment or long-term order) No Yes Yes, can object and can be consulted Yes Yes, unless admitted for assessment
Finland Mental illness Yes NA Yes Clinician (assessment of short-term order); clinician and legal authority (treatment or long-term order) No Yes No No No
France No Yes No No Clinician (assessment or short-term order); clinician and legal authority (treatment or long-term order) Judge interviews patient after admission (between days 10 and 12) Yes Relative can be consulted only on request No No
Germany Mental illness or mental or psychological disability (federal law); mental illness (state laws) Yes Yes Yes, if reason for detention is treatment (federal law) Police (state law in six states), clinician, and legal authority (state law in 16 states and federal law; emergency order); legal authority (federal law; assessments or short-term order); legal authority (federal law; treatment or long-term order) Yes, in federal law; no, in state law (16 states reviewed) Yes Relatives can be involved in court procedure; they can also block hospitalisation if they have legal authority, through power of attorney or court order (federal law) Yes (federal law) No (16 states reviewed), has to be offered
Greece Mental disorder No, if patient lacks capacity; yes, otherwise Yes, unless risk is present Yes Legal authority (emergency order); legal authority (assessment or short-term order); legal authority (treatment or long-term order) No Yes No Yes Yes
Italy No specific diagnosis None No Yes Legal authority (emergency order); legal authority (assessment or short-term order); legal authority (treatment or long-term order) No Yes No No No
New Zealand Mental disorder Yes No No, but detention can be ordered on the basis of need for treatment Clinician (assessment or short-term order); clinician and legal authority (treatment or long-term order) Yes, a judge meets the patient Yes Yes, must be consulted if practicable No No
Northern Ireland Mental disorder Yes No No Clinician (assessment or short-term order); clinician (treatment or long-term order) No Yes Yes Yes Yes, if reason for detention was treatment
Norway Serious mental health illness but, in practice, occurs when the ability to perceive and consider reality is affected (eg, severe eating disorders) No, if patient lacks capacity; yes, otherwise Yes, unless risk is present No Clinician (assessment or short-term order); clinician (treatment or long-term order) No Yes No Yes No
Portugal Severe mental anomaly Yes No Yes Police, legal authority (emergency order); legal authority (assessment or short-term order); legal authority (treatment or long-term order) No Yes No, but can participate in court proceedings No Yes
Ireland Mental disorder Yes (either risk or capacity criterion must be met) Yes (either risk or capacity criterion must be met) Yes, but applies only to detention based on impaired judgement and need for treatment, and not detention based solely on risk Police and clinician (emergency order); clinician (assessment or short-term order); clinician (treatment or long-term order) No Yes No No Yes, if reason for detention was treatment
Scotland Mental disorder Yes Yes Yes, unless it is an emergency detention Clinician (emergency order); clinician (assessment or short-term order); legal authority (treatment or long-term order) No Yes Yes, to consult and appeal Yes No
Spain Mental disorder (which is not defined by law) Yes Yes, no capacity to make own decisions Yes Clinician (emergency order); legal authority (assessment or short-term order); legal authority (treatment or long-term order) No Yes No No Yes
Sweden Serious mental disorder Yes No Yes Police (emergency order); clinician (assessment or short-term order); clinician and legal authority (treatment or long-term order) No Yes Yes, consulted about care plan No Yes
Switzerland Mental disorder or disability or severe neglect Yes No Yes, in emergency for the patient's protection Clinician (emergency order); clinician (assessment or short-term order); clinician (treatment or long-term order) No Yes Yes, involved in all treatment decisions but cannot block detention or treatment No No
The Netherlands Psychiatric disorder or intellectual disability, dementia, or memory issues Yes No Yes Police and legal authority (emergency order); legal authority (assessment or short-term order); clinician and legal authority (treatment or long-term order) Following emergency detention authorised by mayor, the judge visits the patient to decide whether detention should continue Yes, but the mayor's decision is not appealable No Yes Yes

NA=not applicable.

*

The people authorised to issue emergency orders (typically until they can be assessed), assessment or short-term orders (eg, until a court decision is made), and treatment or long-term orders, respectively.

Numbers in brackets represent the number of states or federal territories (six states and two territories reviewed).

Indicated where federal law applies, otherwise numbers in brackets represent number of states (total of 16 states).