Skip to main content
. 2019 May;6(5):403–417. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30090-2

Table 4.

The association between involuntary hospitalisation rates and legislative topic

Yes
No
Difference in annual involuntary hospitalisation rates between groups (p value)
n (%) Median annual rate of involuntary hospitalisation (IQR) n (%) Median annual rate of involuntary hospitalisation (IQR)
It is a requirement that the individual poses a risk to themselves or others? 16 (76%) 118·7 (68·5–153·4) 5 (24%) 78·9 (58·8–98·7) 0·22
It is a requirement that the individual does not have capacity? 5 (24%) 121·9 (98·4–173·0) 16 (76%) 104·8 (59·5–145·5) 0·36
It is a requirement that the individual's condition should be treatable? 10 (48%) 118·7 (78·9–151·4) 11 (52%) 98·7 (58·8–150·9) 0·78
Should the next of kin or nearest relative be involved in the involuntary hospitalisation process? 8 (38%) 104·7 (68·5–123·3) 13 (62%) 121·9 (58·8–151·4) 0·61
Are separate assessment and treatment orders required? 8 (38%) 130·9 (88·6–164·2) 13 (62%) 98·7 (58·8–131·1) 0·22
It is required that the individual be treated once hospitalised? 6 (29%) 118·7 (78·9–155·3) 15 (71%) 98·7 (58·8–150·9) 0·59
Must a legal representative be present? 2 (10%) 114·3 (73·3–155·3) 19 (90%) 111·0 (58·8–150·9) 0·72
Must the longest order be issued by a legal authority?* 15 (71%) 115·5 (73·3–155·3) 6 (29%) 84·9 (55·4–131·1) 0·31
*

If a legal authority is not involved, the order is instead issued by a medical authority.