Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 16;11(4):281–291. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i4.281

Table 3.

Quality (certainty) of evidence of the studies selected, as determined by the GRADE criteria

Parameter
Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication bias Overall certainty of evidence
No. of patients (studies)
Technical success
222 (3 RCTs) Not serious Not serious Not serious Seriousa None Moderate
Clinical success
155 (2 RCTs) Seriousb Not serious Seriousc Seriousa None Very low
Procedure duration
222 (3 RCTs) Not serious Very seriousd Seriouse Seriousa None Very low
Adverse events
222 (3 RCTs) Not serious Very seriousd Not serious Seriousa None Very low
Stent patency
97 (2 RCTs) Seriousb Not serious Seriouse Seriousa None Very low
Stent dysfunction
155 (2 RCTs) Not serious Not serious Seriouse Not serious Strongly suspected Low

aNo significant difference found. bIncomplete outcome data in one study. cStudies used different criteria for clinical success. dI2 > 75%. eOutlier identified. RCTs: Randomized clinical trials.