Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan-Mar;11(1):81–90.

Table 1.

Antioxidant potential of the investigated medicinal plants leaf extracts

Extracts Ferric reducing
antioxidant power1
Iron chelating
activity2
DPPH Scavenging
activity3
Superoxide
scavenging activity3
Nitric oxide
scavenging activity3
A. integrifolia 5.8 ± 0.6d,**** 655.7 ± 50.4a,**** 9.4 ± 0.9c,**** 9.4 ± 2.6b,**** 528.4 ± 18.0b,****
L. glauca 12.1 ± 0.5a,**** 6783.0 ± 1562.0c,* 2.2 ± 0.1a,** 7.6 ± 0.3a,b,* 10.5 ± 1.0a
G. psychotrioides 9.9 ± 0.7b,**** 2189.0 ± 483.3b,**** 2.8 ± 0.3a,**** 6.4 ± 0.6a 21.7 ± 6.4a
E. tinifolia 8.4 ± 0.5c,**** 674.1 ± 87.7a,**** 4.4 ± 0.4b,**** 8.9 ± 1.1b,*** 15.6 ± 2.0a
Gallic acid 24.9 ± 0.9 8002.0 ± 169.6
(47.0 ± 1.0 mM)
0.7 ± 0.1
(3.9 ± 0.6 μM)
5.5 ± 0.2
(32.1 ± 1.3 μM)
9.9 ± 3.4
(58.4 ± 20.1 μM)

11Values are expressed in mmol Fe2+;

2IC50 values are expressed in μg/ml;

3IC50 values are expressed in μg/ml;

Data represent a mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).

Different letters between rows in each column represent significant differences between the extracts (p < 0.05).

Asterisks represent significant differences between the extracts and gallic acid (positive control),

*p ≤ 0.05,

**p ≤ 0.01,

***p ≤ 0.001,

****p ≤ 0.0001.