Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 15;10:223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00223

Table 2.

Demographics and ERP results of three groups (SD in parentheses).a

Control UHR FEP Statistics
Post hoc Scheffe
p values
Effect size (Cohen’s d)
A (n = 120) B (n = 23) C (n = 19)
 Age 26.63 (5.09) 23.64 (5.08) 28.45 (8.33) A vs. B: 0.064
A vs. C: 0.417
B vs. C: 0.022*
 Male gender (%)b 63 (52.5%) 14 (60.9%) 7 (36.8%) χ2 = 2.48, p = 0.29
 Education (years) 15.62 (1.88) 13.74 (2.83) 14.32 (2.08) A vs. B: 0.000**
A vs. C: 0.040*
B vs. C: 0.6655
 Smoking PPD 0.03 (0.1) 0.15 (0.4) 0.16 (0.4) A vs. B: 0.044*
A vs. C: 0.057
B vs. C: 0.997
 PANSS
 Positive symptoms (P1 to P7) 15.0 (2.9) 19.4 (4.6) B vs. C: 0.001** 1.14
 Negative symptoms (N1 to N7) 14.2 (5.5) 14.0 (6.5) B vs. C: 0.923 0.03
 General symptoms (G1 to G16) 35.4 (8.4) 35.6 (9.1) B vs. C: 0.923 0.02
MMN Fz −1.36 (0.81) −0.99 (0.88) −1.11 (0.68) A vs. B: 0.195
A vs. C: 0.517
B vs. C: 0.905
0.44
0.33
0.15
P50
 S1 amplitude 2.44 (1.06) 2.83 (1.59) 2.07 (0.89) A vs. B: 0.366
A vs. C: 0.550
B vs. C: 0.180
0.07
0.38
0.59
 S2 amplitude 1.09 (0.64) 1.48 (0.8) 1.41 (0.93) A vs. B: 0.071
A vs. C: 0.280
B vs. C: 0.967
0.54
0.4
0.08
 P50 ratio 0.51 (0.34) 0.58 (0.34) 0.71 (0.42) A vs. B: 0.706
A vs. C: 0.139
B vs. C: 0.563
0.21
0.52
0.34
 P50 difference 1.35 (1.07) 1.35 (1.53) .66 (1.05)
A vs. B: 1
A vs. C: 0.125
B vs. C: 0.242
0
0.65
0.52
N100
 S1 amplitude 6.73 (3.27) 6.84 (2.92) 4.25 (2.3) A vs. B: 0.991
A vs. C: 0.030*
B vs. C: 0.076
0.04
0.88
0.99
 S2 amplitude 2 (1.31) 2.81 (1.1) 1.93 (1.43) A vs. B: 0.037*
A vs. C: 0.982
B vs. C: 0.164
0.67
0.05
0.69
 N100 ratio 0.36 (0.31) 0.48 (0.29) 0.55 (0.41) A vs. B: 0.282
A vs. C: 0.118
B vs. C: 0.824
0.40
0.52
0.20
 N100 difference 4.73 (3.35) 4.02 (2.48) 2.33 (2.58) A vs. B: 0.657
A vs. C: 0.038*
B vs. C: 0.331
0.24
0.80
0.67

UHR, ultra-high-risk group; FEP, first-episode psychosis group.

a

Some subjects failed to stay before the ERP session was terminated. The number of analyzable P50/N100 subjects was 20 UHR and 13 FEP. The number of analyzable MMN subjects was 18 UHR and 16 FEP.

b

Chi-square tests.

*

p < 0.05.

**

p < 0.01.