Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 30;48(2):20180144. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180144

Table 1.

Summary of descriptive characteristics of included studies

Study characteristics Sample characteristics Intervention characteristics Outcomes
Study/Year Country Population studied
(N = patients)
Age range
(y)
Reference standard Index test
(US)
Transducer frequency (MHz) Target Sensitivity
(%)
Specificity
(%)
Emshoff et al., 1997 Austria TMD (17) 16–60 MRI 2D static/dynamic 7.5 DD Static CM/OM: 50/13
Dynamic CM/OM: 39/13
71/70
100/95
Hayashi et al.,
2001
Japan TMD (18) 8–12 MRI and/or CT 2D dynamic 8 or 10 DD 83 96
Jank et al.,
2001
Austria TMD (66) 13–78 MRI 2D static 12 DD CM: 78
OM: 61
CM: 78
OM: 95
Emshoff et al., 2002 a Austria TMD (64) 17–65 MRI 2D dynamic 12 DD 82 95
Emshoff et al., 2002 b Austria TMD (29) 19–62 MRI 2D static 12 DD CM: 90
OM: 95
CM: 94
OM: 91
Brandlmaier et al., 2003 a Austria TMD (48) 17–67 MRI 2D static 12.5 DD 82 85
Tognini et al.,
2005
Italy TMD (41) ND MRI 2D static/dynamic 8–20 DD 65 80
Landes et al.,
2006 a
Germany TMD (53) 14–77 MRI 3D static 8–12.5 DD 53 74
Cakir-Ozkan et al., 2010 Turkey TMD (28) 16–51 MRI 2D static/dynamic 12 DD CM: 57
OM: 64
CM: 78
OM: 71
Dupuy-Bonafe et al.,2012 France TMD (40) controls (20) 21–59
21–29
MRI 2D static/dynamic 5–12 DD CM: 22
OM: 0
CM; 96
OM: 98
Yang et al.,
2012
China TMD (35) 37.3
mean
MRI 2D static 12 DD 82 94
Razek et al.,
2015
Egypt TMD (20) 15–57 MRI 2D static/dynamic 12 DD 79 72
Manfredini et al.,
2003
Italy TMD (69) ND MRI 2D static/dynamic 8–20 JE 83 73
Tognini et al.,
2003
Italy TMD (44) ND MRI 2D static/dynamic 8–15 JE 75 76
Kirkhus et al.,
2016
Norway JIA (55) <18 MRI 2D static 12–18 JE 72 70
Brandlamaier et al.,
2003 b
Austria TMD (40) 16–78 MRI 2D static 12.5 CC 87 20
Landes et al.,
2006 b
Germany TMD (53) 14–77 MRI 3D static 8–12.5 CC 70 76
Melchiorre et al.,
2003
Italy RA (22), PsA (11) 30–81 MRI 2D static/dynamic 7.5 DD
JE
69
70
30
75
Kaya et al.,
2010
Turkey TMD (52) 28.3
mean
MRI 2D static/dynamic 7.5 DD
JE
91
53
16
63
Gook et al.,
2008
Korean TMD (20) ND CT 2D static 12 DD
CC
95
87
90
62
Sinha et al.,
2012
India TMD (3) ND MRI 2D dynamic 10 DD
CC
33
0
100
100
Emshoff et al.,
2003
Austria TMD (48) 15–72 MRI 2D dynamic 12 DD
CC
95
83
91
63
Habashi et al.,
2015
Israel TMD (39) 18–77 MRI 2D static/dynamic 5–17 DD
CC
74
36
84
83
Landes et al.,
2007
Germany TMD (33) 14–77 MRI 2D/3D static 8–12 DD
CC
2D: 58
3D: 60
2D: 69
3D: 69
63
68
74
78
Muller et al.,
2009
Switzerland JIA (30) 2–16 MRI 2D static/dynamic 12 JE
CC
33* 82*
Jank et al.,
2005
Austria TMD (100) ≥16 MRI 2D dynamic 12 DD
JE
CC
CM/OM: 92/86
81
94
92/91
100
100
Manfredini et al.,2005 Italy TMD/RA/PsA (68) 43.4
mean age
MRI 2D static/dynamic 8–20 DD
JE
CC
56
85
67
73
66
26
Mello et al.,
2011
Brazil TMD (38) 16–65 MRI 2D static 12.5 DD
JE
CC
CM/OM: 83/0
20
15
100/100
100
87

AC, accuracy; CC, condylar change; CM, closed mouth; CT, computed tomography; DD, disk displacement; JE, joint effusion; JIA, juvenile idiopathic arthritis; MHz, megahertz; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ND, not described; OM, open mouth; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; TMD, temporomandibular joint disorder; US, ultrasound; y, year; 2D, two dimensional; 3D, three dimensional; CM, closed mouth;

*separate data not available.