. 2018 Oct 30;48(2):20180144. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180144

Table 4. .

Diagnostic test accuracy, measurements for US in CC assessment of TMD patients

Author, Year	Sample Size (N joints)	Prevalence (%) ^a	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	PPV (%) ^a	NPV (%) ^a	LR+ ^a	LR– ^a	DOR ^a
Emshoffet al 2003	48	18	83	62	34	94	2.24	0.26	8.62
Brandlmaier et al, 2003b	80	87	87	20	88	18	1.08	0.64	1.69
Jank et al, 2005	200	95	94	100	100	45	∞	0.06	∞
Landes et al, 2006b	106	21	69	75	44	90	2.8	0.4	6.68
Landes et al, 2007	66	24	68	75	45	88	2.6	0.4	6.19
Gook et al, 2008	40	20	87	62	36	95	2.33	0.20	10.92
Mello et al, 2011	76	17	15	87	20	83	1.2	0.96	1.18
Habashi et al, 2015	78	50	36	82	66	56	2.0	0.78	2.56

DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; LR+, positive likelihood ratio; LR-, negative likelihood ratio; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value;

when the data is not available, the authors calculated data from information available in the study.