TABLE II.
Segmentation evaluation quality measures comparing our dictionary-based approach to cortical surface segmentation to the initial surface estimate, atlas-based segmentation and a deep convolutional neural network (CNN). Results using our method used 5 × 5 × 5 patches and dictionary size n = 256 with sparsity constraint Γ0 = 4. Values are expressed as Mean±SD. Please refer to Supplemental Fig. S2 for statistical significance testing p-values available in the supplementary files/multimedia tab.
Method | Patch Limits | Dice (%) | HD (mm) | MHD (mm) | MAD (mm) | MESD (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Initial Estimate | Image Size | 93.47 ± 1.86 | 14.38 ± 3.97 | 8.09 ± 2.50 | 3.76 ± 0.68 | 1.66 ± 0.84 |
Atlas-based | Image Size | 94.21 ± 1.77 | 13.18 ± 4.38 | 6.81 ± 2.46 | 3.20 ± 0.70 | 2.51 ± 1.06 |
Deep CNN | 64 × 64 × 64 | 95.00 ± 1.18 | 14.59 ± 4.76 | 7.00 ± 2.71 | 2.94 ± 0.44 | 1.11 ± 0.61 |
Oriented Dictionary | 5 × 5 × 5 | 94.87 ± 1.05 | 13.62 ± 4.41 | 6.75 ± 2.39 | 3.23 ± 0.43 | 0.87 ± 0.24 |