Table 4. NoMAD results.
Item | Overall Mean (SD) (N = 18) |
FFS Mean (SD) (n = 1) |
FHT Mean (SD) (n = 6) |
CHC Mean (SD) (n = 11) |
Mann- Whitney U test (Significance) | Independent T Test (Significance) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coherence (Sense Making) | ||||||
1.1-I can see how the delivery of primary care to transgender patients differs from usual primary care | 3.56 (1.38) | 4.00 (0.00) | 3.67 (1.37) | 3.45 (1.51) | - | p = 0.73 |
1.2-Staff in this organization have a shared understanding of the purpose of primary care for transgender patients | 4.17 (0.86) | 5.00 (0.00) | 4.50 (0.55) | 3.91 (0.94) | - | p = 0.50 |
1.3-I understand how the delivery of primary care to transgender patients affects the nature of my work | 4.28 (0.90) | 5.00 (0.00) | 3.83 (1.17) | 4.45 (0.69) | - | p = 0.21 |
1.4-I can see the potential value of primary care for transgender individuals for my work | 4.78 (0.43) | 5.00 (0.00) | 4.67 (0.52) | 4.82 (0.41) | - | p = 0.23 |
Cognitive Participation | ||||||
2.1-There are key people who drive the delivery of primary care for transgender patients forward to get others involved | 4.44 (0.71) | 5.00 (0.00) | 4.50 (0.55) | 4.36 (0.81) | p = 0.88 | - |
2.2-I believe that participating in the delivery of primary care to transgender patients is a legitimate part of my role | 4.82 (0.39) | 5.00 (0.00) | 4.67 (0.52) | 4.90 (0.32) | p = 0.49 | - |
2.3-I’m open to working with colleagues in new ways to deliver primary care to transgender patients | 4.89 (0.32) | 5.00 (0.00) | 4.83 (0.41) | 4.91 (0.30) | p = 0.81 | - |
2.4-I will continue to support the delivery of primary care services for transgender patients | 4.89 (0.32) | 5.00 (0.00) | 5.00 (0.00) | 4.82 (0.41) | p = 0.59 | - |
Collective Action | ||||||
3.1-I can easily integrate the delivery of transgender primary care into my existing work | 4.41 (0.51) | 4.00 (0.00) | 4.50 (0.55) | 4.40 (0.52) | - | p = 0.65 |
3.2-The delivery of transgender healthcare disrupts working relationships * | 4.18 (1.02) | 4.00 (0.00) | 4.17 (1.60) | 4.18(0.60) | - | p = 0.07 |
3.3-I have confidence in other people’s ability to deliver transgender primary care | 4.11 (0.68) | 4.00 (0.00) | 4.17 (0.75) | 4.09 (0.70) | - | p = 0.80 |
3.4-Work is assigned to those with skills appropriate to the delivery of transgender primary care | 3.83 (0.71) | 4.00 (0.00) | 3.83 (0.41) | 3.82 (0.87) | - | p = 0.18 |
3.5-Sufficient training is provided to enable staff to delivery transgender primary care | 3.67 (0.84) | 4.00 (0.00) | 4.00 (0.63) | 3.45 (0.93) | - | p = 0.09 |
3.6-Sufficient resources are available to support the delivery of transgender primary care | 3.56 (1.04) | 4.00 (0.00) | 3.67 (1.03) | 3.45 (1.13) | - | p = 0.52 |
3.7-Management adequately supports the delivery of transgender primary care | 4.39 (0.85) | 4.00 (0.00) | 4.67 (0.52) | 4.18 (0.98) | - | p = 0.25 |
Reflexive Monitoring | ||||||
4.1-I am aware of reports about the effects of delivery of transgender primary care | 3.88 (1.05) | 5.00 (0.00) | 3.67 (1.03) | 3.90 (1.10) | - | p = 0.62 |
4.2-The staff agree that the delivery of transgender primary care is worthwhile | 4.72 (0.46) | 5.00 (0.00) | 4.67 (0.52) | 4.73 (0.47) | - | p = 0.65 |
4.3-I value the effects that delivering transgender primary care has had on my work | 4.76 (0.44) | 5.00 (0.00) | 4.50 (0.55) | 4.90 (0.32) | - | p = 0.01 |
4.4-Feedback about the delivery of transgender primary care can be used to improve it in the future | 4.76 (0.434) | 5.00 (0.00) | 4.67 (0.52) | 4.80 (0.42) | - | p = 0.31 |
4.5-I can modify how I delivery transgender primary care | 4.47 (0.62) | 5.00 (0.00) | 4.40 (0.55) | 4.45 (0.69) | - | p = 0.41 |
*Item reverse scored.