Table 2-. Results of focused classification on an asymmetric unit when the mask is applied on the wrong region.
Classification was performed after application of a 2-D mask or 3-D mask onto a leg (see Figure 2B), while the heterogeneity was characterized by the mobility in the arms/hands (scenario 1), and the κ coefficient was evaluated for the five SNRs and for each mask. Whereas the 2-D masking displayed some “leakiness” at the highest SNRs, the 3-D masking showed completely random classification.
SNR | 2-D mask | 3-D mask |
---|---|---|
0.100 | 0.23 | −0.01 |
0.050 | 0.11 | 0.00 |
0.025 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
0.013 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
0.006 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
pure noise | −0.01 | 0.00 |